From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Impressions of IDE 98?
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 00:17:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020720221703.GE12637@louise.pinerecords.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0207202329530.22207-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
> > I'm wondering, why haven't IDE 99 and IDE 100 been posted on lkml?
> >
> Ask Martin, I don't know.
Right. I'm puzzled here.
How safe does Martin think people will suppose the patches are if they were
not meant to be reviewed in the standard lkml manner? Given the problems
with 2.5.25 (and 'problems' would be an euphemism here) I'd expect to see
something like a 'safer coding' approach, not 'stealth operations.'
T.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-20 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-20 4:51 Thunder from the hill
2002-07-20 5:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-20 6:51 ` Skip Ford
2002-07-20 14:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-20 21:16 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-20 21:25 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-07-20 21:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-07-20 22:17 ` Tomas Szepe [this message]
2002-07-21 5:28 ` Give Bartlomiej a break! (Re: Impressions of IDE 98?) Andre Hedrick
2002-07-21 5:58 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-07-21 6:14 ` Thunder from the hill
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207210006410.3309-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.a dm>
2002-07-21 7:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-07-21 7:31 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-22 6:11 ` Vojtech Pavlik
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207210130020.3309-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.a dm>
2002-07-21 8:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-07-21 8:23 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-07-21 8:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2002-07-21 9:10 ` Jos Hulzink
2002-07-21 9:52 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-07-21 8:26 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-20 15:18 ` Impressions of IDE 98? Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2002-07-20 21:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020720221703.GE12637@louise.pinerecords.com \
--to=szepe@pinerecords.com \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thunder@ngforever.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®