From: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
To: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
gh@us.ibm.com, Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com, wli@holomorphy.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: large page patch (fwd) (fwd)
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 22:10:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020805221039.A8692@kushida.apsleyroad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200208051321.15368.frankeh@watson.ibm.com>; from frankeh@watson.ibm.com on Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 01:21:15PM -0400
Hubertus Franke wrote:
> The wording was "significant" benefits. The point is/was that as your
> associativity goes up, the likelihood of full cache occupancy
> increases, with cache thrashing in each class decreasing.
> Would have to dig through the literature to figure out at what point
> the benefits are insignificant (<1 %) wrt page coloring.
One of the benefits of page colouring may be that a program's run time
may be expected to vary less from run to run?
In the old days (6 years ago), I found that a video game I was working
on would vary in its peak frame rate by about 3-5% (I don't recall
exactly). Once the program was started, it would remain operating at
the peak frame rate it had selected, and killing and restarting the
program didn't often make a difference either. In DOS, the same program
always ran at a consistent frame rate (higher than Linux as it happens).
The actual number of objects executing in the program, and the amount of
memory allocated, were deterministic in these tests.
This is pointing at a cache colouring issue to me -- although quite
which cache I am not sure. I suppose it could have been something to do
with Linux' VM page scanner access patterns into the page array instead.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-05 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E17ahdi-0001RC-00@w-gerrit2>
2002-08-02 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-03 3:19 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-03 3:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-03 4:17 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-03 4:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-03 4:39 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-03 5:20 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-03 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-03 19:30 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-03 19:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-03 21:18 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-03 21:54 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-04 0:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-04 2:25 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-04 17:19 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-09 15:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-09 15:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-09 16:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-09 16:31 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-09 18:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-09 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-09 17:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-09 16:27 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-09 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-09 17:40 ` yodaiken
2002-08-09 19:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-09 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-09 21:19 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-08-09 17:46 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2002-08-12 9:23 ` Helge Hafting
2002-08-13 3:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-08-13 3:31 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-13 7:28 ` Helge Hafting
2002-08-09 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-10 18:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-08-10 18:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-10 19:55 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-10 19:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-08-09 18:32 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-09 18:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-09 19:17 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-11 20:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-11 22:33 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-11 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-11 22:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-11 23:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-12 0:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-11 23:42 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-11 23:50 ` Larry McVoy
2002-08-12 8:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-13 8:40 ` Rob Landley
2002-08-13 15:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 11:36 ` Rob Landley
2002-08-13 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 12:53 ` Rob Landley
2002-08-13 17:14 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2002-08-13 17:29 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-13 13:18 ` Rob Landley
2002-08-13 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 13:50 ` Rob Landley
2002-08-13 17:45 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-13 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 17:59 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-13 13:35 ` Rob Landley
2002-08-13 19:12 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-22 12:03 ` bill davidsen
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208130942130.7411-100000@home.transmeta.com >
2002-08-13 18:46 ` large page patch (fwd) Mike Galbraith
2002-08-11 23:44 ` large page patch (fwd) (fwd) Daniel Phillips
2002-08-13 8:51 ` Rob Landley
2002-08-13 16:47 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-13 13:09 ` Rob Landley
2002-08-11 23:15 ` Larry McVoy
2002-08-12 1:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-12 5:05 ` Larry McVoy
2002-08-12 10:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-04 0:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-04 17:31 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-04 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-04 19:23 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-04 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-05 5:42 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-04 19:30 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-04 20:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-05 16:59 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-05 17:21 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-05 21:10 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2002-08-04 19:41 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-05 5:40 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-03 18:41 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-03 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-04 0:32 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-03 19:41 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-03 20:53 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-03 21:26 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-03 21:50 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-04 0:34 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-04 0:31 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-04 17:25 ` Hubertus Franke
[not found] <200208041331.24895.frankeh@watson.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208041131380.10314-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3D4D7F24.10AC4BDB@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-08-04 20:20 ` Andi Kleen
2002-08-04 23:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-08-05 23:30 Seth, Rohit
2002-08-06 5:01 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-06 4:58 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-06 5:19 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-06 5:08 ` David S. Miller
2002-08-06 5:32 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-06 19:11 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-06 20:38 Luck, Tony
2002-08-06 21:03 ` Hubertus Franke
2002-08-09 17:51 Seth, Rohit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020805221039.A8692@kushida.apsleyroad.org \
--to=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=gh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®