* TUX in 2.4.20?
@ 2002-08-13 11:39 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-08-13 12:24 ` Alan Cox
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk @ 2002-08-13 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kernel mailing list
hi all
perhaps it's time to ditch khttpd in favour for Tux now? I beleive 2.4.20
would be a nice time to do this.
anyone?
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: TUX in 2.4.20?
2002-08-13 11:39 TUX in 2.4.20? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
@ 2002-08-13 12:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 13:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-08-13 23:26 ` Kelsey Hudson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-08-13 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk; +Cc: Kernel mailing list
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 12:39, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi all
>
> perhaps it's time to ditch khttpd in favour for Tux now? I beleive 2.4.20
> would be a nice time to do this.
>
> anyone?
Tux is invasive. It isnt a clean simple patching job.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: TUX in 2.4.20?
2002-08-13 11:39 TUX in 2.4.20? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-08-13 12:24 ` Alan Cox
@ 2002-08-13 13:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-08-13 23:26 ` Kelsey Hudson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Neukum @ 2002-08-13 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk; +Cc: linux-kernel
Am Dienstag, 13. August 2002 13:39 schrieb Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk:
> hi all
>
> perhaps it's time to ditch khttpd in favour for Tux now? I beleive
> 2.4.20 would be a nice time to do this.
>
> anyone?
2.4 is a stable series. Removing something needs a very good
reason, which just isn't there.
Regards
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: TUX in 2.4.20?
2002-08-13 11:39 TUX in 2.4.20? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-08-13 12:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 13:36 ` Oliver Neukum
@ 2002-08-13 23:26 ` Kelsey Hudson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Hudson @ 2002-08-13 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk; +Cc: Kernel mailing list
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> hi all
>
> perhaps it's time to ditch khttpd in favour for Tux now? I beleive 2.4.20
> would be a nice time to do this.
>
> anyone?
I tend to disagree; the purpose of having a "stable version" is that it's
just that: stable. i.e. no new features, just bug fixes.
Of course, VM rewrites and the like are hardly bug fixes, per se, but
they're not "new features" either.
Kelsey Hudson khudson@compendium.us
Software Engineer/UNIX Systems Administrator
Compendium Technologies, Inc (619) 725-0771
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-13 23:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-13 11:39 TUX in 2.4.20? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-08-13 12:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 13:36 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-08-13 23:26 ` Kelsey Hudson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®