* 2.4.18-3 on rh 7.1?
@ 2002-08-30 8:32 Mat Harris
2002-08-30 10:45 ` Barry K. Nathan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mat Harris @ 2002-08-30 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 511 bytes --]
silly question compared to all you gurus on the list, but it needs to be
asked. I need to fun freeswan (secure wan) between sever a redhat
servers. the only patched kernel i am permitted to use is the rpm for
ipsec enables 2.4.18-3. will this kernel work on redhat 7.1, or will it
fall over at the first opportunity?
thanks guys and keep up the good work, even if it does baffle mortals
like myself
--
Mat Harris OpenGPG Public Key ID: CC14DD34
mat.harris@genestate.com matthewh.genestate.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.18-3 on rh 7.1?
2002-08-30 8:32 2.4.18-3 on rh 7.1? Mat Harris
@ 2002-08-30 10:45 ` Barry K. Nathan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Barry K. Nathan @ 2002-08-30 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mat Harris; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 09:32:33AM +0100, Mat Harris wrote:
> silly question compared to all you gurus on the list, but it needs to be
> asked. I need to fun freeswan (secure wan) between sever a redhat
> servers. the only patched kernel i am permitted to use is the rpm for
> ipsec enables 2.4.18-3. will this kernel work on redhat 7.1, or will it
> fall over at the first opportunity?
I've never done IPSec, but plain use of 2.4.18-3 does work with Red Hat
7.1. Note that you'll need to either satisfy the dependencies by
upgrading some packages from Red Hat 7.3, or use --nodeps. Both work in
my experiences.
However, note that:
+ 2.4.18-3 has a data corruption bug with ext3 on SMP systems, fixed in
2.4.18-4.
+ 2.4.18-4 (and -3) has weird NFS problems which are fixed in 2.4.18-5
+ 2.4.18-[345] have security problems which are fixed in 2.4.18-10
(By the way, does anyone know if new 2.4.9-xx or 2.2.xx kernels are
coming from Red Hat to fix these holes for those releases? Or have
earlier Red Hat kernels (and releases) just been abandoned? Or are
they just not affected?)
-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-30 10:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-30 8:32 2.4.18-3 on rh 7.1? Mat Harris
2002-08-30 10:45 ` Barry K. Nathan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®