From: Cliff White <cliffw@osdl.org>
To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cliffw@osdl.org
Subject: Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 15:44:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209042244.g84MiqK07015@mail.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org> of "Thu, 05 Sep 2002 06:00:55 +0800." <20020904220055.21349.qmail@linuxmail.org>
> Hi all,
> I've just ran the BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 on the 2.4.19 and on the 2.5.33 kernel.
> Here it goes the results:
>
snipped:
Always useful to compare. I think the data from STP show something simular.
I've pulled some reports, rather than send a huge email, here are the URL's
(btw STP runs v4.0.1 UNIXbench)
runs made on 2-CPU platform
2.4.19: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/3877/results/report
2.5.33: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/4928/results/report
Another compare...why does pre5 appear a little worse than pre4 ?
2.4.20-pre5: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/4836/results/report
2.4.20-pre4: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/4581/results/report
cliffw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-04 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-04 22:00 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-04 22:44 ` Cliff White [this message]
2002-09-04 23:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-09-05 13:48 ` side-by-side " bert hubert
2002-09-05 15:11 ` venom
2002-09-06 3:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-06 3:34 ` Calculating kernel logical address Imran Badr
2002-09-07 1:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-08 0:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-08 18:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 5:00 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-09 5:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 5:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 7:09 ` side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 bert hubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200209042244.g84MiqK07015@mail.osdl.org \
--to=cliffw@osdl.org \
--cc=ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®