mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: Paolo Ciarrocchi <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:09:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020906070911.GA31562@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17n9im-0006Ef-00@starship>

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:23:48AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Thursday 05 September 2002 15:48, bert hubert wrote:
> > Arithmetic Test (type = arithoh)        3598100.4 lps    3435944.6 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = register)        201521.0 lps     197870.4 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = short)           190245.9 lps     145140.8 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = int)             201904.5 lps     104440.5 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = long)            201906.4 lps     177757.4 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = float)           210562.7 lps     208476.4 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = double)          210385.9 lps     208443.3 lps
> 
> What kind of arithmetic is this?  Why on earth would arithmetic vary
> from one kernel to another?

I wasn't involved in this benchmark, I just reformatted the results.
However, it might be that this benchmark is a tad braindead and 'suffers'
from far better timing resolution because of HZ=1000. I'm unsure. I saw that
this benchmark used something like a Sparcstation 5 as a reference platform,
so maybe it is not geared for today's processors.

Regards,

bert hubert

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.tk                              the dot in .tk
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-09-06  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-04 22:00 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-04 22:44 ` Cliff White
2002-09-04 23:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-09-05 13:48 ` side-by-side " bert hubert
2002-09-05 15:11   ` venom
2002-09-06  3:23   ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-06  3:34     ` Calculating kernel logical address Imran Badr
2002-09-07  1:44       ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-08  0:01         ` David S. Miller
2002-09-08 18:44           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09  5:00             ` David S. Miller
2002-09-09  5:17               ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09  5:28                 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06  7:09     ` bert hubert [this message]
2002-09-05 15:37 side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-06 10:28 ` Pavel Machek
2002-09-08 14:09   ` venom
2002-09-06  7:44 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-07 12:21 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-08 19:26 ` Pavel Machek
2002-09-08 22:56 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-09 10:46 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020906070911.GA31562@outpost.ds9a.nl \
    --to=ahu@ds9a.nl \
    --cc=ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillips@arcor.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®