From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: Paolo Ciarrocchi <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:09:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020906070911.GA31562@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17n9im-0006Ef-00@starship>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:23:48AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Thursday 05 September 2002 15:48, bert hubert wrote:
> > Arithmetic Test (type = arithoh) 3598100.4 lps 3435944.6 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = register) 201521.0 lps 197870.4 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = short) 190245.9 lps 145140.8 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = int) 201904.5 lps 104440.5 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = long) 201906.4 lps 177757.4 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = float) 210562.7 lps 208476.4 lps
> > Arithmetic Test (type = double) 210385.9 lps 208443.3 lps
>
> What kind of arithmetic is this? Why on earth would arithmetic vary
> from one kernel to another?
I wasn't involved in this benchmark, I just reformatted the results.
However, it might be that this benchmark is a tad braindead and 'suffers'
from far better timing resolution because of HZ=1000. I'm unsure. I saw that
this benchmark used something like a Sparcstation 5 as a reference platform,
so maybe it is not geared for today's processors.
Regards,
bert hubert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.tk the dot in .tk
http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-06 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-04 22:00 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-04 22:44 ` Cliff White
2002-09-04 23:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-09-05 13:48 ` side-by-side " bert hubert
2002-09-05 15:11 ` venom
2002-09-06 3:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-06 3:34 ` Calculating kernel logical address Imran Badr
2002-09-07 1:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-08 0:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-08 18:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 5:00 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-09 5:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-09 5:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 7:09 ` bert hubert [this message]
2002-09-05 15:37 side-by-side Re: BYTE Unix Benchmarks Version 3.6 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-06 10:28 ` Pavel Machek
2002-09-08 14:09 ` venom
2002-09-06 7:44 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-07 12:21 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-08 19:26 ` Pavel Machek
2002-09-08 22:56 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2002-09-09 10:46 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020906070911.GA31562@outpost.ds9a.nl \
--to=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®