From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Dodd <ted@cypress.com>
Cc: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@bitwizard.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Problems accessing USB Mass Storage
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:21:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020917152102.A17561@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D87A6E3.5090407@cypress.com>; from ted@cypress.com on Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 05:04:19PM -0500
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 05:04:19PM -0500, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
>
> Rogier Wolff wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:46:31AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:37:37PM -0500, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> >>
> >>>I get the feeling it's not a true mass storage device.
> >>
> >>Sounds like it.
> >
> >
> > Nope. Sure does sound like it's a mass storage device. And it works
> > too.
> >
> > The kernel managed to read the partition table off it, and got
> > one valid partition: sda1.
>
> Accept that you cannot read data from the device. At all.
> Even dd fails. And the windows drivers work (using XP
> in vmware it think it was) correctly on this same device.
>
> -Thomas
But it did read the first 8 blocks off the devices when it
read the partition, the usb debug showed:
usb-storage: Command READ_10 (10 bytes)
usb-storage: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 30 da
With offsets starting at 0 -
Bytes 2 - 5 are the logical block address, all 0.
Bytes 7 - 8 are the transfer length - 8 blocks.
The last two bytes are junk.
You should be able to run the equivalent:
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/zero bs=512 count=8
And, look in dmesg for the failure message of the first read that fails, it
could have set the device offline.
-- Patrick Mansfield
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-17 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-17 11:25 Mark C
2002-09-17 15:18 ` Greg KH
2002-09-17 17:37 ` Thomas Dodd
2002-09-17 17:46 ` Greg KH
2002-09-17 18:06 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-17 20:09 ` Thomas Dodd
2002-09-17 21:01 ` Mark C
2002-09-17 21:43 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-09-17 22:04 ` Thomas Dodd
2002-09-17 22:12 ` [Linux-usb-users] " Randy.Dunlap
2002-09-17 22:21 ` Patrick Mansfield [this message]
2002-09-17 22:51 ` Mark C
2002-09-17 23:09 ` [Linux-usb-users] " Randy.Dunlap
[not found] ` <mailman.1032306001.9987.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-09-18 1:37 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-09-18 6:01 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-09-17 18:15 Jonathan Corbet
2002-09-17 18:22 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-09-17 19:46 ` Mark C
2002-09-17 20:12 ` jbradford
2002-09-17 21:21 ` Jonathan Corbet
2002-09-17 19:50 ` Thomas Dodd
2002-09-17 19:58 ` Matthew Dharm
2002-09-17 20:13 ` Thomas Dodd
2002-09-18 9:28 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-18 9:22 ` Andries Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020917152102.A17561@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@bitwizard.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ted@cypress.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®