mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: lell02 <lell02@stud.uni-passau.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Status of UDF CD packet writing?
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:45:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021009104537.GD620@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210091042.g99Agwjm009964@tom.rz.uni-passau.de>

On Wed, Oct 09 2002, lell02 wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 08 2002, lell02 wrote:
> >> hi, 
> >> 
> >> >Will Jens Axboes patch for CD packet writing for CD-R/RW make it in
> >> >before the feature freeze? I know Jens Axboe is busy with more basic I/O
> >> >stuff, but i sincerely hope it can be squeezed in before 2.6/3.0 is
> >> >released.
> >> 
> >> jens stated on this about 1-2 days ago. he said, it would be little
> >> modification on the ide-cdrom, to make it work with cd-mrw/ packet
> >> writing.  so it could go in after the feature freeze.
> >
> >You might be talking about two different patches -- one for cd-rw
> >support (this is the pktcdvd (or -packet) patch that Peter Osterlund has
> >been maintaining) and the other for cd-mrw. The cd-mrw patch is very
> >small, not a lot is required to support that in the cd driver.
> >Supporting cd-rw is a lot harder, basically you have to do in software
> >what cd-mrw does in hardware (defect management, read-modify-write
> >packet gathering, etc).
> >
> >cd-mrw will definitely be in 2.6. cd-rw support maybe, I haven't even
> >looked at that lately.
> >
> 
> thanx for clearing out these differences. 
> 
> but, isn't cd-mrw supposed to replace the old packet-writing
> technique?  so, in the end, there wouldn't be any need for
> packet-writing, if every burner ships with cd-mrw-support... i read in
> the "specs", that the technology would be much better.

(btw, please break your lines at 72 chars or similar)

Yeah that is true, the need for the cd-rw packet writing patch should
diminish once cd-mrw is in all drives.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-09 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-09 11:37 lell02
2002-10-09 10:45 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-10-09 12:37 ` Brian Gerst
2002-10-10 17:46 ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-09 22:24 lell02
2002-10-08 22:46 lell02
2002-10-09  8:54 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-08 18:38 Tommy Vestermark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021009104537.GD620@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=lell02@stud.uni-passau.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®