From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@quark.didntduck.org>
To: lell02 <lell02@stud.uni-passau.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Status of UDF CD packet writing?
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:37:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA42315.9020308@quark.didntduck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200210091042.g99Agwjm009964@tom.rz.uni-passau.de>
lell02 wrote:
>>On Tue, Oct 08 2002, lell02 wrote:
>>
>>>hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>>Will Jens Axboes patch for CD packet writing for CD-R/RW make it in
>>>>before the feature freeze? I know Jens Axboe is busy with more basic I/O
>>>>stuff, but i sincerely hope it can be squeezed in before 2.6/3.0 is
>>>>released.
>>>
>>>jens stated on this about 1-2 days ago. he said, it would be little
>>>modification on the ide-cdrom, to make it work with cd-mrw/ packet
>>>writing. so it could go in after the feature freeze.
>>
>>You might be talking about two different patches -- one for cd-rw
>>support (this is the pktcdvd (or -packet) patch that Peter Osterlund has
>>been maintaining) and the other for cd-mrw. The cd-mrw patch is very
>>small, not a lot is required to support that in the cd driver.
>>Supporting cd-rw is a lot harder, basically you have to do in software
>>what cd-mrw does in hardware (defect management, read-modify-write
>>packet gathering, etc).
>>
>>cd-mrw will definitely be in 2.6. cd-rw support maybe, I haven't even
>>looked at that lately.
>>
>
>
> thanx for clearing out these differences.
>
> but, isn't cd-mrw supposed to replace the old packet-writing technique?
> so, in the end, there wouldn't be any need for packet-writing, if every burner
> ships with cd-mrw-support... i read in the "specs", that the technology would
> be much better.
For drives that support cd-mrw. Older cd-rw drives will still need the
full blown packet writing patch though.
--
Brian Gerst
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-09 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-09 11:37 lell02
2002-10-09 10:45 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-09 12:37 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2002-10-10 17:46 ` Bill Davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-09 22:24 lell02
2002-10-08 22:46 lell02
2002-10-09 8:54 ` Jens Axboe
2002-10-08 18:38 Tommy Vestermark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DA42315.9020308@quark.didntduck.org \
--to=bgerst@quark.didntduck.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=lell02@stud.uni-passau.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®