* [BENCHMARK] 2.5.41-mm2 with contest
@ 2002-10-11 4:11 Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2002-10-11 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Bill Davidsen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Here are the latest results for 2.5.41-mm2 with contest
(http://contest.kolivas.net)
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 67.7 98 0 0 1.01
2.5.38 [3] 72.0 93 0 0 1.07
2.5.39 [2] 72.2 93 0 0 1.07
2.5.40 [1] 72.5 93 0 0 1.08
2.5.41 [1] 73.8 93 0 0 1.10
2.5.41-mm1 [3] 73.3 92 0 0 1.09
2.5.41-mm2 [2] 74.2 92 0 0 1.10
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 106.5 59 112 43 1.59
2.5.38 [3] 89.5 74 34 28 1.33
2.5.39 [2] 91.2 73 36 28 1.36
2.5.40 [2] 82.8 80 25 23 1.23
2.5.41 [1] 91.1 73 38 30 1.36
2.5.41-mm1 [3] 88.8 75 32 27 1.32
2.5.41-mm2 [2] 91.7 75 37 27 1.37
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 492.6 14 38 10 7.33
2.5.38 [1] 4000.0 1 500 1 59.55
2.5.39 [2] 423.9 18 30 11 6.31
2.5.40 [1] 315.7 25 22 10 4.70
2.5.41 [2] 607.5 13 47 12 9.04
2.5.41-mm1 [3] 307.7 26 18 10 4.58
2.5.41-mm2 [3] 294.3 26 17 10 4.38
Both the -mm results avoid the increased IO based slowdown that has come back
in 2.5.41
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 100.0 72 33 3 1.49
2.5.38 [3] 107.3 70 34 3 1.60
2.5.39 [2] 103.1 72 31 3 1.53
2.5.40 [2] 102.5 72 31 3 1.53
2.5.41 [1] 101.6 73 30 3 1.51
2.5.41-mm1 [3] 144.6 50 37 2 2.15
2.5.41-mm2 [3] 139.2 52 36 2 2.07
You can see clearly how the lowered vm_swappiness present since 2.5.41-mm1 has
made it slower under mem_load. It has relaxed slightly since the changes to
- -mm2. Below is a set of results with -mm2 and my suggested autoregulation
changes to vm_swappiness:
2.5.41-mm2v [2] 114.6 64 29 2 1.71
While it still is slower than vanilla, this modification makes for a far less
swappy kernel except when it is heavily called upon.
Here are also the experimental loads:
tarc_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [2] 106.5 70 1 8 1.59
2.5.38 [1] 97.2 79 1 6 1.45
2.5.39 [1] 91.8 83 1 6 1.37
2.5.40 [1] 96.9 80 1 6 1.44
2.5.41 [1] 93.3 81 1 6 1.39
2.5.41-mm1 [3] 91.6 81 1 5 1.36
2.5.41-mm2 [2] 91.0 81 1 5 1.35
tarx_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [1] 132.4 55 2 9 1.97
2.5.38 [1] 120.5 63 2 8 1.79
2.5.39 [1] 108.3 69 1 6 1.61
2.5.40 [1] 110.7 68 1 6 1.65
2.5.41 [2] 138.8 53 2 8 2.07
2.5.41-mm1 [3] 188.4 43 2 7 2.80
2.5.41-mm2 [2] 195.3 38 2 7 2.91
This also seems to be detrimentally affected by decreased vm_swappiness, as
autoregulation changes the results to this:
2.5.41-mm2v [2] 136.4 54 1 7 2.03
Which seems to bring it back into line with 2.5.41
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [2] 134.1 54 14 5 2.00
2.5.38 [2] 100.5 76 9 5 1.50
2.5.39 [2] 101.3 74 14 6 1.51
2.5.40 [1] 101.5 73 13 5 1.51
2.5.41 [1] 101.1 75 7 4 1.51
2.5.41-mm1 [3] 106.8 70 5 3 1.59
2.5.41-mm2 [2] 104.2 71 6 4 1.55
lslr_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [1] 89.8 77 1 20 1.34
2.5.38 [1] 99.1 71 1 20 1.48
2.5.39 [1] 101.3 70 2 24 1.51
2.5.40 [1] 97.0 72 1 21 1.44
2.5.41 [1] 93.6 75 1 18 1.39
2.5.41-mm1 [3] 96.8 72 1 21 1.44
2.5.41-mm2 [2] 97.4 72 1 21 1.45
Comments?
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9pk9pF6dfvkL3i1gRAh2kAJwO1GFsRij3Wj1r+T893DtgMZ8eRgCghu4Q
LKMO/ieLHpZdWBE1XW/S3+4=
=LfDR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-10-11 4:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-11 4:11 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.41-mm2 with contest Con Kolivas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®