From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au
Cc: taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:31:02 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021015.213102.80213000.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15788.57476.858253.961941@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>
From: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:44:04 +1000
Presumably on a sufficiently large SMP machine that this became an
issue, there would be multiple NICs. Maybe it would make sense to
have one udp socket for each NIC. Would that make sense? or work?
It feels to me to be cleaner than one for each CPU.
Doesn't make much sense.
Usually we are talking via one IP address, and thus over
one device. It could be using multiple NICs via BONDING,
but that would be transparent to anything at the socket
level.
Really, I think there is real value to making the socket
per-cpu even on a 2 or 4 way system.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-16 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-18 8:14 Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-09-18 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-18 23:54 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 0:16 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19 2:13 ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-09-19 3:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19 10:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 13:15 ` [NFS] " Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-09-19 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19 21:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-21 11:56 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-14 5:50 ` Neil Brown
2002-10-14 6:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 10:45 ` kuznet
2002-10-14 10:48 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 12:01 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-14 14:12 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-16 3:44 ` Neil Brown
2002-10-16 4:31 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-10-16 15:04 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 2:03 ` [NFS] " Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 2:31 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-17 13:16 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 13:26 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-17 14:10 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 16:26 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-18 5:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-10-18 7:19 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-18 15:12 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-19 20:34 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-22 21:16 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-23 9:29 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-24 15:32 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-16 11:09 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-16 17:02 ` kaza
2002-10-17 4:36 ` rddunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021015.213102.80213000.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome