From: Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com>
To: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au,
davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS for 2.5.36
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:16:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210221616.23282.habanero@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021020.053424.41629995.taka@valinux.co.jp>
On Saturday 19 October 2002 15:34, Hirokazu Takahashi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > Congestion avoidance mechanism of NFS clients might cause this
> > > situation. I think the congestion window size is not enough
> > > for high end machines. You can make the window be larger as a
> > > test.
> >
> > Is this a concern on the client only? I can run a test with just one
> > client and see if I can saturate the 100Mbit adapter. If I can, would we
> > need to make any adjustments then? FYI, at 115 MB/sec total throughput,
> > that's only 2.875 MB/sec for each of the 40 clients. For the TCP result
> > of 181 MB/sec, that's 4.525 MB/sec, IMO, both of which are comfortable
> > throughputs for a 100Mbit client.
>
> I think it's a client issue. NFS servers don't care about cogestion of UDP
> traffic and they will try to response to all NFS requests as fast as they
> can.
>
> You can try to increase the number of clients or the number of mount points
> for a test. It's easy to mount the same directory of the server on some
> directries of the client so that each of them can work simultaneously.
> # mount -t nfs server:/foo /baa1
> # mount -t nfs server:/foo /baa2
> # mount -t nfs server:/foo /baa3
I don't think it is a client congestion issue at this point. I can run the
test with just one client on UDP and achieve 11.2 MB/sec with just one mount
point. The client has 100 Mbit Ethernet, so should be the upper limit (or
really close). In the 40 client read test, I have only achieved 2.875 MB/sec
per client. That and the fact that there are never more than 2 nfsd threads
in a run state at one time (for UDP only) leads me to believe there is still
a scaling problem on the server for UDP. I will continue to run the test and
poke a prod around. Hopefully something will jump out at me. Thanks for all
the input!
Andrew Theurer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-22 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-18 8:14 Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-09-18 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-18 23:54 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 0:16 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19 2:13 ` Aaron Lehmann
2002-09-19 3:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19 10:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-19 13:15 ` [NFS] " Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-09-19 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-19 21:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-21 11:56 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-14 5:50 ` Neil Brown
2002-10-14 6:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 10:45 ` kuznet
2002-10-14 10:48 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 12:01 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-14 14:12 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-16 3:44 ` Neil Brown
2002-10-16 4:31 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-16 15:04 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 2:03 ` [NFS] " Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 2:31 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-17 13:16 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 13:26 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-17 14:10 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-17 16:26 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-18 5:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-10-18 7:19 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-18 15:12 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-19 20:34 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-22 21:16 ` Andrew Theurer [this message]
2002-10-23 9:29 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-24 15:32 ` Andrew Theurer
2002-10-16 11:09 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-10-16 17:02 ` kaza
2002-10-17 4:36 ` rddunlap
2002-09-19 2:00 [NFS] " Lever, Charles
[not found] <3D89176B.40FFD09B@digeo.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20020919.221513.28808421.taka@valinux.co.jp.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3D8A36A5.846D806@digeo.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-09-20 1:00 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-20 1:09 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-20 1:23 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-20 1:27 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-20 2:06 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-20 2:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-20 2:28 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-20 2:20 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-20 2:35 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-16 14:04 Lever, Charles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210221616.23282.habanero@us.ibm.com \
--to=habanero@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®