From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: phil-list@redhat.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
S Vamsikrishna <vamsi_krishna@in.ibm.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@thegnar.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] thread-aware coredumps, 2.5.43-C3
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:40:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021017164040.GA12608@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210171009240.12653-100000@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:11:21AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - properly wait for all threads that share the same MM to serialize with
> the coredumping thread. This is CLONE_VM based, not tied to
> CLONE_THREAD and/or signal semantics, ie. old-style (or different-style)
> threaded apps will be properly stopped as well.
>
> The locking might look a bit complex, but i wanted to keep the
> __exit_mm() overhead as low as possible. It's not quite trivial to get
> these bits right, because 'sharing the MM' is detached from signals
> semantics, so we cannot rely on broadcast-kill catching all threads. So
> zap_threads() iterates through every thread and zaps those which were
> left out. (There's a minimal race left in where a newly forked child
> might escape the attention of zap_threads() - this race is fixed by the
> OOM fixes in the mmap-speedup patch.)
My only problem with this is that you're waiting for all threads by
SIGKILLing them. If a process vforks or clones, and then the child
crashes, the parent will receive a SIGKILL - iff we are dumping core.
That's a change in behavior that seems a bit too arbitrary to me.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-17 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-08 12:09 [patch] thread-aware coredumps part 1, tcore-2.5.41-A6 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-08 13:30 ` mgross
2002-10-17 9:11 ` [patch] thread-aware coredumps, 2.5.43-C3 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-17 16:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-10-21 14:29 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-21 14:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-21 16:16 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-21 16:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-17 21:07 ` mgross
2002-10-18 0:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-18 13:57 ` Mark Gross
2002-10-18 14:03 ` Mark Gross
2002-10-19 13:26 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-10-19 19:26 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-19 19:34 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-10-19 13:20 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-10-19 17:32 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-10-19 18:42 ` Mark Gross
2002-10-18 1:10 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-18 1:35 ` Mark Gross
2002-10-18 2:12 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-18 2:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-10-18 2:40 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-18 2:58 ` Mark Gross
2002-10-18 3:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-18 14:00 ` mgross
2002-10-21 15:17 ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-03 7:32 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-10-08 18:04 ` [patch] thread-aware coredumps part 1, tcore-2.5.41-A6 mgross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021017164040.GA12608@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=phil-list@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=vamsi_krishna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome