mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: James McKenzie <james@fishsoup.dhs.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [2.5 patch] allow only one Toshiba Type-O IR Port driver in the kernel
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:29:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021029172932.GE32449@bougret.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0210291619310.14144-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:26:50PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> 
> > 	Adrian,
> 
> Hi Jean,
> 
> > 	Thanks very much for the report. I personally uses modules,
> > and I would prefer the ability to compile both modules, so that people
> > can try both without having to recompile their kernel.
> 
> notice that my patch doesn't disallow to build both drivers as modules.
> 
> > 	I think a much better patch (and simpler in the long term)
> > would be to just rename 'toshoboe_init' to 'donauboe_init' (plus the
> > few other offending function). This is a case where the name doesn't
> > really matter.
> > 	What do you think ?
> 
> That's an alternate solution that should also fix the compile problem.
> 
> But as stated above my patch doesn't affect the case when both drivers are
> modular which is usually the desired setup when you want to switch between
> the two drivers.

	I personally prefer to make the driver code cleaner rather
than making the config/Makefile rules more complex. I believe that in
the long run, it always pay to keep things simple.
	But, I'm not religious about it.

> cu
> Adrian

	How do we proceed ? Do you want to send patches yourself
directly, or do you want to wait until I send my next IrDA update ?
	Regards,

	Jean


  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-29 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-20 14:44 Adrian Bunk
2002-10-21 17:32 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2002-10-29 15:26   ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-29 17:29     ` Jean Tourrilhes [this message]
2002-10-30 12:14       ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021029172932.GE32449@bougret.hpl.hp.com \
    --to=jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=james@fishsoup.dhs.org \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trivial@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®