From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5 current bk fix setting scsi queue depths
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:17:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210301717.g9UHHs902706@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com> of "Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:58:44 PST." <20021030085844.A11040@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com>
patmans@us.ibm.com said:
> This patch fixes a problem with the current linus bk tree setting scsi
> queue depths to 1. Please apply.
This patch causes the depth specification to be retained when we release
commandblocks. Since releasing command blocks is supposed only to be done
when we give up the device (and therefore, is supposed to clear everything),
your fix looks like it's merely masking a problem, not fixing it.
Is the real problem that this controller is getting a release command blocks
and then a reallocate of them after slave_attach is called? If so, that's
probably what needs to be fixed.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-30 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <patmans@us.ibm.com>
2002-10-30 16:58 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-10-30 17:17 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2002-10-30 18:05 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-10-31 0:44 ` James Bottomley
2002-09-09 14:57 [RFC] Multi-path IO in 2.5/2.6 ? James Bottomley
2002-09-09 16:56 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-09-09 17:34 ` James Bottomley
2002-09-09 18:40 ` Mike Anderson
2002-09-10 13:02 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-10 16:03 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-09-10 16:27 ` Mike Anderson
2002-09-10 0:08 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-09-10 7:55 ` Jeremy Higdon
2002-09-10 13:04 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-10 16:20 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-09-10 13:16 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-10 19:26 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-09-11 14:20 ` James Bottomley
2002-09-11 19:17 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-11 19:37 ` James Bottomley
2002-09-11 19:52 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-09-12 1:15 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-09-11 21:38 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-09-11 20:30 ` Doug Ledford
2002-09-11 21:17 ` Mike Anderson
2002-09-10 17:21 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-09-10 18:42 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-09-10 19:00 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-09-10 19:37 ` Patrick Mansfield
2002-09-11 0:21 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210301717.g9UHHs902706@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome