From: vasya vasyaev <vasya197@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Machine's high load when HIGHMEM is enabled
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:54:35 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021104185435.11019.qmail@web20504.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DC5337C.4090506@quark.didntduck.org>
Hello,
First of all - thanks to these people, who responded
to my question.
I have some news...
I've tried kernels:
2.4.19 - the same result
2.5.44 - the same result
2.5.45 - the same result
If I take 1 Gb of memory away, then computer works
much better, faster (something like without enabled
HIGHMEM at all).
The same effect takes place if I say mem=1024M while
physically box has 2Gb of RAM - everything is fine!
But if I start HIGHMEM enabled kernel on this box (2Gb
RAM), then it works too slowly...
The questions are:
1. is there anyone on the list, who has the same or
near configuration ? (main is that the box has >=2Gb
of RAM)
2. do you experience the same problems ?
3. maybe it's not a problem at all?!? I mean maybe
linux kernel works this way with such amount of memory
and there is no problem with that?
4. the case I've described =
http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2001-02/0292.html
?
and finally, if this could be solved - please tell,
how should I set up the kernel/kernel settings to get
appropriate results in performance ?
Thank you.
--- Brian Gerst <bgerst@quark.didntduck.org> wrote:
> 2.4 can only do I/O to and from lowmem. This means
> highmem pages have
> to use bounce buffers in lowmem, and th edata is
> copied to/from highmem
> which is causing the cpu load. This has been
> corrected in 2.5, which
> can do I/O to any page the device can DMA from.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-04 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-03 14:17 vasya vasyaev
2002-11-03 14:32 ` Brian Gerst
2002-11-03 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-04 0:43 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-11-04 18:54 ` vasya vasyaev [this message]
2002-11-04 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-05 10:36 ` vasya vasyaev
2002-11-03 15:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-04 19:49 Nakajima, Jun
2002-11-05 9:08 ` vasya vasyaev
2002-11-05 21:10 ` vasya vasyaev
2002-11-05 21:38 Nakajima, Jun
2002-11-06 10:14 ` vasya vasyaev
2002-11-06 16:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-06 17:10 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-19 9:29 ` vasya vasyaev
2002-11-19 9:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-20 1:03 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-11-19 15:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021104185435.11019.qmail@web20504.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=vasya197@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®