* [PATCH] Up silly limit on .config line length
@ 2002-11-05 23:38 Russell King
2002-11-06 13:32 ` Roman Zippel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2002-11-05 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: zippel
kconfig brought in a bug whereby no .config line can be longer than 128
characters. This causes a problem since it is quite common to have
.config lines longer than this on ARM, especially when they contain the
default kernel command line, like:
CONFIG_CMDLINE="console=ttySA0,38400n8 cpufreq=221200 rw root=/dev/ram0 mtdparts=sa1100:512K(boot),1M(kernel),2560K(initrd),4M("
The effect of this bug can be seen above; in this case it has chopped
off the parameters that allow this machine to boot; the missing parameters
should be:
"root) load_ramdisk=1 prompt_ramdisk=0 mem=32M noinitrd initrd=0xc0800000,3M"
I believe that this arbitary limit should be eliminated by some method.
However, as a "get you working" patch with a new arbitary limit of 1024
characters:
--- linux/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c Tue Nov 5 23:24:42 2002
+++ linux-sa1100/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c Tue Nov 5 23:28:57 2002
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
int conf_read(const char *name)
{
FILE *in = NULL;
- char line[128];
+ char line[1024];
char *p, *p2;
int lineno = 0;
struct symbol *sym;
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
}
}
- while (fgets(line, 128, in)) {
+ while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), in)) {
lineno++;
switch (line[0]) {
case '#':
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Up silly limit on .config line length
2002-11-05 23:38 [PATCH] Up silly limit on .config line length Russell King
@ 2002-11-06 13:32 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-06 13:34 ` Russell King
2002-11-06 21:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roman Zippel @ 2002-11-06 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Russell King wrote:
> I believe that this arbitary limit should be eliminated by some method.
> However, as a "get you working" patch with a new arbitary limit of 1024
> characters:
I was already wondering, how much I should allow. :)
But I'd rather set an arbitrary limit (and warn) than allowing an
arbitrary long string.
bye, Roman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Up silly limit on .config line length
2002-11-06 13:32 ` Roman Zippel
@ 2002-11-06 13:34 ` Russell King
2002-11-06 21:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2002-11-06 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roman Zippel; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 02:32:30PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Russell King wrote:
> > I believe that this arbitary limit should be eliminated by some method.
> > However, as a "get you working" patch with a new arbitary limit of 1024
> > characters:
>
> I was already wondering, how much I should allow. :)
> But I'd rather set an arbitrary limit (and warn) than allowing an
> arbitrary long string.
That'd also work, but note that stderr/stdout messages are very easily
missed when using menuconfig.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Up silly limit on .config line length
2002-11-06 13:32 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-06 13:34 ` Russell King
@ 2002-11-06 21:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2002-11-06 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roman Zippel; +Cc: Russell King, linux-kernel
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 02:32:30PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
>
> I was already wondering, how much I should allow. :)
> But I'd rather set an arbitrary limit (and warn) than allowing an
> arbitrary long string.
Since this has an unknown effect it should give an error, not just a
warning.
In the case raised by Russell an error would have been better, he would
never try to boot the kernel in that case.
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-06 21:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-05 23:38 [PATCH] Up silly limit on .config line length Russell King
2002-11-06 13:32 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-06 13:34 ` Russell King
2002-11-06 21:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®