* OT:Has a spam law been passed?
@ 2002-11-11 22:05 Hell.Surfers
2002-11-11 22:38 ` Matti Aarnio
2002-11-12 1:53 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hell.Surfers @ 2002-11-11 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 166 bytes --]
This spam talks about a anti spam law passed by the US, is it true...?
Regards, Dean.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:02:54 +0000 "chubarovandrey" <chol@prodigy.com> wrote:
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2056 bytes --]
From: "chubarovandrey" <chol@prodigy.com>
To: "" <hell.surfers@cwctv.net>
Subject: Bulk Email Sending & Bullet Proof Web Hosting
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:02:54 +0000
Message-ID: <2745023816khoo1vxuihuvCfzfwy1qhw@earthlink.net>
We offer you e-mail addresses databases for advertisement
mailing; we sell databases also carry out mailing and hosting
for the advertising projects.
We can work on a turnkey project create a site with original design,
program and subject contents. Our databases updates constantly
with the e-mail addresses from all over the world.
Their validity and originality are verified. Today they contains over
than 50 million addresses.
We use our own mailing soft which can be ideally adjusted for every
customer. We have a high-speed channel and a high power server.
The constant of our service demand allows us to keep low prices.
http://www.e-mailpromo.net
Please don't hesitate to contact us anytime!
We'll be happy to answer every your question!
HTTP: www.e-mailpromo.net
E-mail: info@e-mailpromo.net
We received your address from a public area.
We apologize if this letter has reached you by mistake.
We'll not disturb you any more.
NB. This message is sent in compliance with the new e-mail bill section
301. Under Bill S. 1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th US Congress.
This message can not be considered as Spam as long as we include the way
to be Removed, Paragraph (a)(c) of S. 1618.
TO REMOVE YOUR ADDRESS FROM YOUR MAILING LIST: you can send message to
info@e-mailpromo.net with Subject "Remove".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: OT:Has a spam law been passed?
2002-11-11 22:05 OT:Has a spam law been passed? Hell.Surfers
@ 2002-11-11 22:38 ` Matti Aarnio
2002-11-12 1:53 ` Rik van Riel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matti Aarnio @ 2002-11-11 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hell.Surfers; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:05:03PM +0000, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> This spam talks about a anti spam law passed by the US, is it true...?
Go see: www.cauce.org
I have seen that particular one in SPANISH language sent from Brazilia,
as if proposed (but never ratified) US legistlation has any relevance
to people anywhere. Referral to the "murkowsky" spam-bill is direct
admittance that it is spam.
> Regards, Dean.
/Matti Aarnio
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: OT:Has a spam law been passed?
2002-11-11 22:05 OT:Has a spam law been passed? Hell.Surfers
2002-11-11 22:38 ` Matti Aarnio
@ 2002-11-12 1:53 ` Rik van Riel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2002-11-12 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hell.Surfers; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> This spam talks about a anti spam law passed by the US, is it true...?
No. Bill S. 1618 has never been passed. Note that this does
make a good regexp since any email claiming to be compliant
with this bill is known to be spam.
This is also a nice illustration of:
Rule #1: spammers lie
Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-12 1:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-11 22:05 OT:Has a spam law been passed? Hell.Surfers
2002-11-11 22:38 ` Matti Aarnio
2002-11-12 1:53 ` Rik van Riel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®