From: Ben Fennema <bfennema@attbi.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Erlend Aasland <erlend-a@ux.his.no>,
bfennema@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu, dave@trylinux.com,
linux_udf@hpesjro.fc.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (i386)
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 21:24:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021203212403.B19780@attbi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021203233744.AA03F2C29E@lists.samba.org>; from rusty@rustcorp.com.au on Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:37:04AM +1100
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:37:04AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <20021203125120.GA2417@johanna5.ux.his.no> you write:
> > I noticed that CONFIG_UDF_RW is not used anywhere, so I removed it from all
> > the defconfigs.
>
> But it's used in 2.4.20. It *looks* like it's on by default in 2.5,
> but I just want the authors to confirm that the option isn't coming
> back.
>
> Ben, Dave?
Yup.. It's gone for good.
Ben
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-04 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-03 12:51 Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 12:56 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (arm) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 12:59 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (cris) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:02 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (ia64) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:04 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (m68knommu) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-05 10:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-12-03 13:07 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (mips) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:10 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (parisc) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:12 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (ppc) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:15 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (sparc) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:18 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (um) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:22 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (sh) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:25 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (x86-64) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 23:37 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (i386) Rusty Russell
2002-12-04 5:24 ` Ben Fennema [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021203212403.B19780@attbi.com \
--to=bfennema@attbi.com \
--cc=bfennema@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu \
--cc=dave@trylinux.com \
--cc=erlend-a@ux.his.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_udf@hpesjro.fc.hp.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome