From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Erlend Aasland <erlend-a@ux.his.no>
Cc: bfennema@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu, dave@trylinux.com,
linux_udf@hpesjro.fc.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (i386)
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:37:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021203233744.AA03F2C29E@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 Dec 2002 13:51:20 BST." <20021203125120.GA2417@johanna5.ux.his.no>
In message <20021203125120.GA2417@johanna5.ux.his.no> you write:
> I noticed that CONFIG_UDF_RW is not used anywhere, so I removed it from all
> the defconfigs.
But it's used in 2.4.20. It *looks* like it's on by default in 2.5,
but I just want the authors to confirm that the option isn't coming
back.
Ben, Dave?
Rusty.
> diff -urN linux-2.5.50/arch/i386/defconfig linux-2.5.50-eaa/arch/i386/defconfig
> --- linux-2.5.50/arch/i386/defconfig Tue Oct 22 00:13:57 2002
> +++ linux-2.5.50-eaa/arch/i386/defconfig Tue Dec 3 00:48:05 2002
> @@ -804,7 +804,6 @@
> CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y
> # CONFIG_SYSV_FS is not set
> CONFIG_UDF_FS=y
> -# CONFIG_UDF_RW is not set
> # CONFIG_UFS_FS is not set
> # CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_FS is not set
>
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-03 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-03 12:51 Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 12:56 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (arm) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 12:59 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (cris) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:02 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (ia64) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:04 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (m68knommu) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-05 10:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-12-03 13:07 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (mips) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:10 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (parisc) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:12 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (ppc) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:15 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (sparc) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:18 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (um) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:22 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (sh) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 13:25 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (x86-64) Erlend Aasland
2002-12-03 23:37 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2002-12-04 5:24 ` [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (i386) Ben Fennema
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021203233744.AA03F2C29E@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=bfennema@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu \
--cc=dave@trylinux.com \
--cc=erlend-a@ux.his.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_udf@hpesjro.fc.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome