[BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1368 bytes --]

Hi Alan,

using 2.4.20-BK tree gives me:

flushing ide devices: hda hdd

at reboot time in an endless loop drawing over the screen. No reboot will be 
made, I have to do that either by sysrq-b or reset button.

Using:

[*]   PCI IDE chipset support
[*]     Generic PCI bus-master DMA support
[*]       Use PCI DMA by default when available
<*>     Intel PIIXn chipsets support
[*]   IGNORE word93 Validation BITS

root@codeman:[/] # hdparm -i /dev/hda

/dev/hda:

 Model=MAXTOR 6L060J3, FwRev=A93.0500, SerialNo=663219752652
 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
 RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=32256, SectSize=21298, ECCbytes=4
 BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=1819kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
 CurCHS=4047/16/255, CurSects=16511760, LBA=yes, LBAsects=117266688
 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
 PIO modes:  pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 
 DMA modes:  mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 
 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5 udma6 
 AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
 Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-5 T13 1321D revision 1:  1 2 3 4 5


BTW: The attached patch is needed to build the 2.4.20-BK tree successfully
     because "local_irq_*" is missing and ld complains about undefined
     reference at linking time.

Any hints to fix that flushing ide bla foobar thing?

TIA!

ciao, Marc

[-- Attachment #2: ide-i386-stuff-2.4.21.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1602 bytes --]

diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.vanilla/include/asm-i386/system.h linux.20-ac1/include/asm-i386/system.h
--- linux.vanilla/include/asm-i386/system.h	2002-11-29 21:27:23.000000000 +0000
+++ linux.20-ac1/include/asm-i386/system.h	2002-11-11 15:59:38.000000000 +0000
@@ -322,8 +319,18 @@
 /* used in the idle loop; sti takes one instruction cycle to complete */
 #define safe_halt()		__asm__ __volatile__("sti; hlt": : :"memory")
 
+#define __save_and_cli(x)	do { __save_flags(x); __cli(); } while(0);
+#define __save_and_sti(x)	do { __save_flags(x); __sti(); } while(0);
+
 /* For spinlocks etc */
+#if 0
 #define local_irq_save(x)	__asm__ __volatile__("pushfl ; popl %0 ; cli":"=g" (x): /* no input */ :"memory")
+#define local_irq_set(x)	__asm__ __volatile__("pushfl ; popl %0 ; sti":"=g" (x): /* no input */ :"memory")
+#else
+#define local_irq_save(x)	__save_and_cli(x)
+#define local_irq_set(x)	__save_and_sti(x)
+#endif
+
 #define local_irq_restore(x)	__restore_flags(x)
 #define local_irq_disable()	__cli()
 #define local_irq_enable()	__sti()
@@ -338,6 +345,8 @@
 #define sti() __global_sti()
 #define save_flags(x) ((x)=__global_save_flags())
 #define restore_flags(x) __global_restore_flags(x)
+#define save_and_cli(x) do { save_flags(x); cli(); } while(0);
+#define save_and_sti(x) do { save_flags(x); sti(); } while(0);
 
 #else
 
@@ -345,6 +354,8 @@
 #define sti() __sti()
 #define save_flags(x) __save_flags(x)
 #define restore_flags(x) __restore_flags(x)
+#define save_and_cli(x) __save_and_cli(x)
+#define save_and_sti(x) __save_and_sti(x)
 
 #endif
 

Re: [BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Saturday 07 December 2002 14:35, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:

Hi Alan,

ok, just another bug I hit:

pdc202xx_new: static build, module build do not have Special FastTrack 
features so the system will say neither IDE port enabled (BIOS) so it won't 
work.

PDC20270: IDE controller at PCI slot 01:01.0
PDC20270: chipset revision 2
PDC20270: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
PDC20270: ROM enabled at 0xefdd0000
    ide0: BM-DMA at 0x9400-0x9407, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
    ide1: BM-DMA at 0x9408-0x940f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
ICH2: IDE controller at PCI slot 00:1f.1
ICH2: chipset revision 17
ICH2: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
    ide2: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
    ide3: BM-DMA at 0xffa8-0xffaf, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:DMA
ide2: ports already in use, skipping probe
ide3: ports already in use, skipping probe
 hda:

HANG! Nothing more happens. I wait for ~ 5 minutes.


same with disabled IRQ11 for PCI in BiOS:

PDC20270: IDE controller at PCI slot 01:01.0
PDC20270: chipset revision 2
PDC20270: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
PDC20270: ROM enabled at 0xefdd0000
    ide0: BM-DMA at 0x9400-0x9407, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
    ide1: BM-DMA at 0x9408-0x940f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
ICH2: IDE controller at PCI slot 00:1f.1
ICH2: chipset revision 17
ICH2: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
    ide2: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
    ide3: BM-DMA at 0xffa8-0xffaf, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:DMA
ide2: ports already in use, skipping probe
ide3: ports already in use, skipping probe
 hda:<3>hda: lost interrupt
hda: lost interrupt
 hda1

<going ahead>

hda: lost interrupt
hda: lost interrupt
hda: lost interrupt
hda: lost interrupt
cramfs: wrong magic
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:03
 <0> Rebooting in 60 seconds..


P.S.: Is this appreciated for -BK tree's to reports bugs? I assume yes :)

ciao, Marc

Re: [BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Sunday 08 December 2002 02:51, Alan Cox wrote:

Hi Alan,

> > flushing ide devices: hda hdd
> Marcelo dropped some of the patches I sent (or his mailer or some random
> box in between did). You also want the ll_rw_blk change from -ac
ah, ok :) thnx Alan.

ciao, Marc

Re: [BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[J.A. Magallon]

On 2002.12.08 Alan Cox wrote:
>On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 13:35, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>> 
>> using 2.4.20-BK tree gives me:
>> 
>> flushing ide devices: hda hdd
>
>Marcelo dropped some of the patches I sent (or his mailer or some random
>box in between did). You also want the ll_rw_blk change from -ac
>

BTW, sometimes i noticed that my box powers of after

flushing ide devices: hda hdb hdc hdd

and others I just see a couple disks and then power-off in the middle
of the flush message. Is this something known ?

TIA

-- 
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon@able.es>      \                 Software is like sex:
werewolf.able.es                         \           It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.1 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.20-jam1 (gcc 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2-4mdk))

Re: [BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[Alan Cox]

On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 13:35, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> 
> using 2.4.20-BK tree gives me:
> 
> flushing ide devices: hda hdd

Marcelo dropped some of the patches I sent (or his mailer or some random
box in between did). You also want the ll_rw_blk change from -ac

Re: [BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[Henning P. Schmiedehausen]

Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de> writes:

>pdc202xx_new: static build, module build do not have Special FastTrack 
>features so the system will say neither IDE port enabled (BIOS) so it won't 
>work.
[...]
>    ide0: BM-DMA at 0x9400-0x9407, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
>    ide1: BM-DMA at 0x9408-0x940f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
[...]
>    ide2: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
>    ide3: BM-DMA at 0xffa8-0xffaf, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:DMA

Shouldn't these bei hde - hdh ? I'd be scared by my machine reporting
hda thrice. :-)

	Regards
		Henning


-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen       -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH     hps@intermeta.de

Am Schwabachgrund 22  Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0   info@intermeta.de
D-91054 Buckenhof     Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20   

Re: [BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Sunday 08 December 2002 10:29, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:

Hi Henning,

> >    ide0: BM-DMA at 0x9400-0x9407, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
> >    ide1: BM-DMA at 0x9408-0x940f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
> >    ide2: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
> >    ide3: BM-DMA at 0xffa8-0xffaf, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:DMA
>
> Shouldn't these bei hde - hdh ? I'd be scared by my machine reporting
> hda thrice. :-)
That's why I've writte this also ;) It's an exact output of what I got.

ciao, Marc

Re: [BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Sunday 08 December 2002 15:13, Alan Cox wrote:

Hi Alan,

> > That's why I've writte this also ;) It's an exact output of what I got.
> Send me an lspci -vxx
I can send that from the running system now, 2.4.20 vanilla, 2.4.20-BK hangs 
(as described) so lspci isn't possible :)

ciao, Marc

Re: [BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[Alan Cox]

On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 12:37, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Sunday 08 December 2002 10:29, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> 
> Hi Henning,
> 
> > >    ide0: BM-DMA at 0x9400-0x9407, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
> > >    ide1: BM-DMA at 0x9408-0x940f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
> > >    ide2: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
> > >    ide3: BM-DMA at 0xffa8-0xffaf, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:DMA
> >
> > Shouldn't these bei hde - hdh ? I'd be scared by my machine reporting
> > hda thrice. :-)
> That's why I've writte this also ;) It's an exact output of what I got.

Send me an lspci -vxx

Re: [BUG] 2.4.20-BK

[Alan Cox]

On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 13:40, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Sunday 08 December 2002 15:13, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> Hi Alan,
> 
> > > That's why I've writte this also ;) It's an exact output of what I got.
> > Send me an lspci -vxx
> I can send that from the running system now, 2.4.20 vanilla, 2.4.20-BK hangs 
> (as described) so lspci isn't possible :)

2.4.20-bk seems to be missing lots of patches that are part of the IDE
stuff so don't bother with that - 2.4.20 or 2.4.20-ac are what I need
data from.