From: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
To: tomita@cinet.co.jp
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (21/21)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:59:42 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021215.225942.24871004.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DFC818F.80E3DC00@cinet.co.jp>
In article <3DFC818F.80E3DC00@cinet.co.jp> (at Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:20:15 +0900), Osamu Tomita <tomita@cinet.co.jp> says:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PC9800
> if (mpf->mpf_physptr)
> reserve_bootmem(mpf->mpf_physptr, PAGE_SIZE);
> +#else
> + /*
> + * PC-9800's MPC table places on the very last of
> + * physical memory; so that simply reserving PAGE_SIZE
> + * from mpg->mpf_physptr yields BUG() in
> + * reserve_bootmem.
> + */
> + if (mpf->mpf_physptr) {
> + /*
> + * We cannot access to MPC table to compute
> + * table size yet, as only few megabytes from
> + * the bottom is mapped now.
> + */
> + unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE;
> + unsigned long end = max_low_pfn * PAGE_SIZE;
> + if (mpf->mpf_physptr + size > end)
> + size = end - mpf->mpf_physptr;
> + reserve_bootmem(mpf->mpf_physptr, size);
> + }
> +#endif
> +
I'm not sure if we need this #ifdef;
it doesn't seem that this #ifdef CONFIG_PC9800 part is harmful
for others at all.
Well, if it is required, I prefer putting #ifdef..#endif inside the
if-clause like this:
if (mpf->mpf_physptr) {
unsigned long size = PAGE_SIZE;
#ifdef CONFIG_PC9800
/*
* PC-9800's MPC table places on the very last of
* physical memory; so that simply reserving PAGE_SIZE
* from mpg->mpf_physptr yields BUG() in
* reserve_bootmem.
*
* We cannot access to MPC table to compute
* table size yet, as only few megabytes from
* the bottom is mapped now.
*/
unsigned long end = max_low_pfn * PAGE_SIZE;
if (mpf->mpf_physptr + size > end)
size = end - mpf->mpf_physptr;
#endif
reserve_bootmem(mpf->mpf_physptr, size);
}
--
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-15 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-15 9:52 [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 10:34 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (1/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 10:39 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (2/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 10:51 ` Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 10:56 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (3/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:06 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (4/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:15 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (5/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:28 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (6/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:40 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (7/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:58 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (8/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:05 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (9/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:15 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (10/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:20 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (11/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:26 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (12/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:39 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (13/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:43 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (14/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:47 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (15/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:56 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (16/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:32 ` Problems with OnStream USB30 Tape drive on the USB ports on a FIC VA-503+ - VIA MVP3 Chipset Linux Kernel Developer
2002-12-18 22:07 ` Kurt Garloff
2002-12-15 13:01 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (17/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:04 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (18/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:11 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (19/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:15 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (20/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:20 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (21/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:59 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 [this message]
2002-12-16 14:36 ` Osamu Tomita
2002-12-17 15:36 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-17 16:25 ` Osamu Tomita
2002-12-17 17:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-18 14:40 ` Osamu Tomita
2002-12-18 16:03 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-16 18:24 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 Alan Cox
2002-12-16 18:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021215.225942.24871004.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--to=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomita@cinet.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®