From: Osamu Tomita <tomita@cinet.co.jp>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (2/21)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:51:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DFC5EBA.4FE45141@cinet.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DFC50E9.656B96D0@cinet.co.jp>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 350 bytes --]
This is re-send. Sorry, I forgot attachment.
NEC PC-9800 subarchitecture support patch for 2.5.50-ac1 (2/21)
This is updates for include/asm-i386/gdc.h.
Killed warning from gcc-3.2.
diffstat:
include/asm-i386/gdc.h | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
Regards,
Osamu Tomita
[-- Attachment #2: gdc_h-update.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3885 bytes --]
diff -Nru linux-2.5.50-ac1/include/asm-i386/gdc.h.old linux-2.5.50-ac1/include/asm-i386/gdc.h
--- linux-2.5.50-ac1/include/asm-i386/gdc.h.old 2002-12-11 13:10:08.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.5.50-ac1/include/asm-i386/gdc.h 2002-12-11 17:26:46.000000000 +0900
@@ -55,26 +55,29 @@
_scr_memsetw(u16 *s, u16 c, unsigned int count)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_GDC_32BITACCESS
- __asm__ __volatile__ ("shr%L1 %1
- jz 2f
-" /* cld kernel code now assumes DF = 0 any time */ "\
- test%L0 %3,%0
- jz 1f
- stos%W2
- dec%L1 %1
-1: shr%L1 %1
- rep
- stos%L2
- jnc 2f
- stos%W2
- rep
- stos%W2
-2:"
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "shr%L1 %1\n\t"
+ "jz 2f\n\t"
+ /* "cld\n\t" kernel code now assumes DF = 0 any time */
+ "test%L0 %3,%0\n\t"
+ "jz 1f\n\t"
+ "stos%W2\n\t"
+ "dec%L1 %1\n"
+"1: shr%L1 %1\n\t"
+ "rep\n\t"
+ "stos%L2\n\t"
+ "jnc 2f\n\t"
+ "stos%W2\n\t"
+ "rep\n\t"
+ "stos%W2\n"
+"2:"
: "=D"(s), "=c"(count)
: "a"((((u32) c) << 16) | c), "g"(2),
"0"(s), "1"(count));
#else
- __asm__ __volatile__ ("rep\n\tstosw"
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "rep\n\t"
+ "stosw"
: "=D"(s), "=c"(count)
: "0"(s), "1"(count / 2), "a"(c));
#endif
@@ -92,23 +95,26 @@
_scr_memcpyw(u16 *d, u16 *s, unsigned int count)
{
#if 1 /* def CONFIG_GDC_32BITACCESS */
- __asm__ __volatile__ ("shr%L2 %2
- jz 2f
-" /* cld */ "\
- test%L0 %3,%0
- jz 1f
- movs%W0
- dec%L2 %2
-1: shr%L2 %2
- rep
- movs%L0
- jnc 2f
- movs%W0
-2:"
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "shr%L2 %2\n\t"
+ "jz 2f\n\t"
+ /* "cld\n\t" */
+ "test%L0 %3,%0\n\t"
+ "jz 1f\n\t"
+ "movs%W0\n\t"
+ "dec%L2 %2\n"
+"1: shr%L2 %2\n\t"
+ "rep\n\t"
+ "movs%L0\n\t"
+ "jnc 2f\n\t"
+ "movs%W0\n"
+"2:"
: "=D"(d), "=S"(s), "=c"(count)
: "g"(2), "0"(d), "1"(s), "2"(count));
#else
- __asm__ __volatile__ ("rep\n\tmovsw"
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "rep\n\t"
+ "movsw"
: "=D"(d), "=S"(s), "=c"(count)
: "0"(d), "1"(s), "2"(count / 2));
#endif
@@ -126,30 +132,35 @@
#if 1 /* def CONFIG_GDC_32BITACCESS */
u16 tmp;
- __asm__ __volatile__ ("shr%L3 %3
- jz 2f
- std
- lea%L1 -4(%1,%3,2),%1
- lea%L2 -4(%2,%3,2),%2
- test%L1 %4,%1
- jz 1f
- mov%W0 2(%2),%0
- sub%L2 %4,%2
- dec%L3 %3
- mov%W0 %0,2(%1)
- sub%L1 %4,%1
-1: shr%L3 %3
- rep
- movs%L0
- jnc 3f
- mov%W0 2(%2),%0
- mov%W0 %0,2(%1)
-3: cld
-2:"
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "shr%L3 %3\n\t"
+ "jz 2f\n\t"
+ "std\n\t"
+ "lea%L1 -4(%1,%3,2),%1\n\t"
+ "lea%L2 -4(%2,%3,2),%2\n\t"
+ "test%L1 %4,%1\n\t"
+ "jz 1f\n\t"
+ "mov%W0 2(%2),%0\n\t"
+ "sub%L2 %4,%2\n\t"
+ "dec%L3 %3\n\t"
+ "mov%W0 %0,2(%1)\n\t"
+ "sub%L1 %4,%1\n"
+"1: shr%L3 %3\n\t"
+ "rep\n\t"
+ "movs%L0\n\t"
+ "jnc 3f\n\t"
+ "mov%W0 2(%2),%0\n\t"
+ "mov%W0 %0,2(%1)\n"
+"3: cld\n"
+"2:"
: "=r"(tmp), "=D"(d), "=S"(s), "=c"(count)
: "g"(2), "1"(d), "2"(s), "3"(count));
#else
- __asm__ __volatile__ ("std\n\trep\n\tmovsw\n\tcld"
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "std\n\t"
+ "rep\n\t"
+ "movsw\n\t"
+ "cld"
: "=D"(d), "=S"(s), "=c"(count)
: "0"((void *) d + count - 2),
"1"((void *) s + count - 2), "2"(count / 2));
@@ -179,23 +190,26 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_GDC_32BITACCESS
/* VRAM is quite slow, so we align source pointer (%esi)
to double-word alignment. */
- __asm__ __volatile__ ("shr%L2 %2
- jz 2f
-" /* cld */ "\
- test%L0 %3,%0
- jz 1f
- movs%W0
- dec%L2 %2
-1: shr%L2 %2
- rep
- movs%L0
- jnc 2f
- movs%W0
-2:"
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "shr%L2 %2\n\t"
+ "jz 2f\n\t"
+ /* "cld\n\t" */
+ "test%L0 %3,%0\n\t"
+ "jz 1f\n\t"
+ "movs%W0\n\t"
+ "dec%L2 %2\n"
+"1: shr%L2 %2\n\t"
+ "rep\n\t"
+ "movs%L0\n\t"
+ "jnc 2f\n\t"
+ "movs%W0\n"
+"2:"
: "=D"(d), "=S"(s), "=c"(count)
: "g"(2), "0"(d), "1"(s), "2"(count));
#else
- __asm__ __volatile__ ("rep\n\tmovsw"
+ __asm__ __volatile__ (
+ "rep\n\t"
+ "movsw"
: "=D"(d), "=S"(s), "=c"(count)
: "0"(d), "1"(s), "2"(count / 2));
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-15 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-15 9:52 [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 10:34 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (1/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 10:39 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (2/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 10:51 ` Osamu Tomita [this message]
2002-12-15 10:56 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (3/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:06 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (4/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:15 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (5/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:28 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (6/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:40 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (7/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 11:58 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (8/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:05 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (9/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:15 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (10/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:20 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (11/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:26 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (12/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:39 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (13/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:43 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (14/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:47 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (15/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 12:56 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (16/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:32 ` Problems with OnStream USB30 Tape drive on the USB ports on a FIC VA-503+ - VIA MVP3 Chipset Linux Kernel Developer
2002-12-18 22:07 ` Kurt Garloff
2002-12-15 13:01 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (17/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:04 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (18/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:11 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (19/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:15 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (20/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:20 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 (21/21) Osamu Tomita
2002-12-15 13:59 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-12-16 14:36 ` Osamu Tomita
2002-12-17 15:36 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-17 16:25 ` Osamu Tomita
2002-12-17 17:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-18 14:40 ` Osamu Tomita
2002-12-18 16:03 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-16 18:24 ` [PATCHSET] PC-9800 addtional for 2.5.50-ac1 Alan Cox
2002-12-16 18:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DFC5EBA.4FE45141@cinet.co.jp \
--to=tomita@cinet.co.jp \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome