mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anomalous Force <anomalous_force@yahoo.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: holy grail
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 07:56:00 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021229155600.95805.qmail@web13204.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50L.0212281842020.26879-100000@imladris.surriel.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Size: 2201 bytes --]


--- Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Anomalous Force wrote:
> > --- Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net> wrote:
> >
> > > because it would be completely unmaintainable (1,2). (I expect
> to
> >
> > this is not true. if the system were an integral part of the
> overall
> > design, then programming would include it apriori.
> 
> This has been said before, but "for some reason" everybody
> who said it went quiet the moment they started working on
> a patch and have never been heard from again.
> 
> Either they're still working on the problem (after a four
> years) or they've moved on to an easier/realistic project.

i have stated this would be extremely difficult. no single person
could attempt this without the support of the other developers as
the effort must include all aspects of the kernel to some extent.
the original discussion for this was to show that kexec() _could_
become something that is a holy grail amoung kernel developers:
hot-swap. if all of the kernel developers think this can not be done,
then it is not worth discussion any further. for a single person to
make this happen, it would require that a single kernel version
become frozen, and all aspects of it altered to support the
operations of hot swapping. in such a senario, the development of
the mainstream kernel would have progressed to the point that
any attempting to apply a patch would prove futile as the code base
for the patch has become obsolete. it is for this reason that i say
it would take the awareness of all the developers moving forward.

> 
> regards,
> 
> Rik
> -- 
> Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
> http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
> Current spamtrap:  <a
href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>


=====
Main Entry: anom·a·lous 
1 : inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual, normal, or expected: IRREGULAR, UNUSUAL
2 (a) : of uncertain nature or classification (b) : marked by incongruity or contradiction : PARADOXICAL
synonym see IRREGULAR

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-29 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-27  0:51 Anomalous Force
2002-12-27  4:03 ` Werner Almesberger
2002-12-27  7:21   ` Anomalous Force
2002-12-27  7:37     ` Ingo Oeser
2002-12-27 11:30     ` Werner Almesberger
2002-12-28 16:35       ` Anomalous Force
2002-12-28 20:43         ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-29 15:56           ` Anomalous Force [this message]
2002-12-29 16:44             ` John Bradford
2002-12-30  1:05           ` Alan Cox
2002-12-30  1:32             ` Werner Almesberger
2002-12-30  2:45               ` Jeff Dike
2002-12-30  3:55                 ` David Lang
2002-12-30  4:39                   ` Anomalous Force
2002-12-30 17:57                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-12-30 13:30               ` Alan Cox
2002-12-29 23:53         ` Werner Almesberger
2002-12-27 13:24     ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-30  5:00 Anomalous Force
2002-12-30  6:46 ` Ed Sweetman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021229155600.95805.qmail@web13204.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=anomalous_force@yahoo.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=wa@almesberger.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®