From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange performance change 59 -> 61/62
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 00:04:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030222000410.11a46e03.akpm@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22560000.1045899976@[10.10.2.4]>
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> wrote:
>
> > mark_inode_dirty() tends to be called _very_ frequently. Too frequently.
> >
> > Could you try remounting all filesystems noatime with
> >
> > mount /mnt/point -o remount,noatime
> >
> > and the below patch will prevent us calling the barrier-happy
> > current_kernel_time() for noatime mounts.
>
> Cool, that works nicely - thanks.
>
> 2.5.59-mjb6: 84 __mark_inode_dirty
> 2.5.61-mjb1: 594 __mark_inode_dirty
> 2.5.61-mjb1-no_mb: 74 __mark_inode_dirty
> 2.5.61-mjb1-noatime: 65 __mark_inode_dirty
>
OK. We used to only run mark_inode_dirty() for atime updates just when it
had actually changed. ie: once per second. But for reasons which remain
obscure that was taken out.
This probably explains your ext3 woes. Poor old ext3 has to do a ton of work
in ext3_mark_inode_dirty(), yet on 99% of the calls, nothing has even
changed. Which is why I suggested that you retest ext3 with noatime.
I shall fix it up.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-22 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-19 16:23 Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-19 18:19 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 7:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-21 7:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-21 7:45 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 17:27 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-21 20:20 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-22 7:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-22 8:04 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-02-22 8:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-19 17:19 Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030222000410.11a46e03.akpm@digeo.com \
--to=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®