From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name>
To: Duncan Sands <baldrick@wanadoo.fr>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chas williams <chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB speedtouch: better proc info
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:54:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200302252154.44628.oliver@neukum.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200302250922.35971.baldrick@wanadoo.fr>
> Hi Oliver, thanks for your comments. While I agree with you in
> principle, I disagree in practice. The driver exports the following
> information in /proc/net/atm/speedtch:
>
> (1) name and location of the USB device
> (2) MAC address (serial number)
> (3) AAL5 transmission statistics
> (4) Line status
> (5) Modem status
>
> (1) is needed in order to work out which modem corresponds to
> which ATM device. This should be dealt with using sysfs, however
> the ATM layer has not yet been ported to sysfs. Until it is, this
> seems like the best way to export this information.
For the time being I agree.
> (2) and (3) are redundant - they are published by the ATM layer
> in other proc files. I thought about removing them, but decided
> against it because (a) it can be convenient having everything in
> one proc file, and (b) it is backwards compatible with the 2.4
> out-of-kernel driver. They could go.
As long as you have a proc file at all, you may as well print them, IMHO.
> You suggested (in a private mail) using netif_carrier_on/off to
> export (4). The ATM layer already has a method for reporting this,
> and I use it: set the ATM_PHY_SIG_FOUND/LOST bits in
> atm_dev->signal. The problem is that the ATM layer doesn't do
> anything with this info (like export it to user space). So I think
> it is fair enough to export it in the proc file while waiting for the
> ATM layer to be fixed.
Yes, but I think that you should notify the network layer too.
I see no reason any network driver shouldn't report this directly.
There's nothing specific to ATM in losing signal.
It's purely physical thing low level drivers should deal with.
> As for (5), this could be exported using sysfs. Since it is a
> USB matter, I guess I could do this now. So this could also go.
Yes.
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-25 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-24 9:58 Duncan Sands
2003-02-24 10:43 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-02-25 8:22 ` Duncan Sands
2003-02-25 20:54 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2003-02-26 7:31 ` Duncan Sands
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200302252154.44628.oliver@neukum.name \
--to=oliver@neukum.name \
--cc=baldrick@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®