From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New cpu macro and i386 cleanup
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:17:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304051719_MC3-1-3328-B238@compuserve.com> (raw)
Robert Love wrote:
> On a glance, it looked like at least some of them were.
Looks like do_rdmsr is not disabling preempt. This should fix
it (compiled not tested.)
diff -u --exclude-from=/home/me/.exclude -r linux-2.5.66-ref/arch/i386/kernel/cpuid.c linux-2.5.66-uni/arch/i386/kernel/cpuid.c
--- linux-2.5.66-ref/arch/i386/kernel/cpuid.c Sat Mar 29 09:16:32 2003
+++ linux-2.5.66-uni/arch/i386/kernel/cpuid.c Fri Apr 4 18:45:19 2003
@ -56,7 +56,7 @
{
struct cpuid_command *cmd = (struct cpuid_command *) cmd_block;
- if ( cmd->cpu == smp_processor_id() )
+ if ( is_current_cpu(cmd->cpu) )
cpuid(cmd->reg, &cmd->data[0], &cmd->data[1], &cmd->data[2], &cmd->data[3]);
}
@ -65,7 +65,7 @
struct cpuid_command cmd;
preempt_disable();
- if ( cpu == smp_processor_id() ) {
+ if ( is_current_cpu(cpu) ) {
cpuid(reg, &data[0], &data[1], &data[2], &data[3]);
} else {
cmd.cpu = cpu;
diff -u --exclude-from=/home/me/.exclude -r linux-2.5.66-ref/arch/i386/kernel/msr.c linux-2.5.66-uni/arch/i386/kernel/msr.c
--- linux-2.5.66-ref/arch/i386/kernel/msr.c Sat Mar 29 09:16:32 2003
+++ linux-2.5.66-uni/arch/i386/kernel/msr.c Sat Apr 5 16:18:29 2003
@ -100,7 +100,7 @
{
struct msr_command *cmd = (struct msr_command *) cmd_block;
- if ( cmd->cpu == smp_processor_id() )
+ if ( is_current_cpu(cmd->cpu) )
cmd->err = wrmsr_eio(cmd->reg, cmd->data[0], cmd->data[1]);
}
@ -108,7 +108,7 @
{
struct msr_command *cmd = (struct msr_command *) cmd_block;
- if ( cmd->cpu == smp_processor_id() )
+ if ( is_current_cpu(cmd->cpu) )
cmd->err = rdmsr_eio(cmd->reg, &cmd->data[0], &cmd->data[1]);
}
@ -118,29 +118,31 @
int ret;
preempt_disable();
- if ( cpu == smp_processor_id() ) {
+ if ( is_current_cpu(cpu) )
ret = wrmsr_eio(reg, eax, edx);
- preempt_enable();
- return ret;
- } else {
+ else {
cmd.cpu = cpu;
cmd.reg = reg;
cmd.data[0] = eax;
cmd.data[1] = edx;
smp_call_function(msr_smp_wrmsr, &cmd, 1, 1);
- preempt_enable();
- return cmd.err;
+
+ ret = cmd.err;
}
+ preempt_enable();
+ return ret;
}
static inline int do_rdmsr(int cpu, u32 reg, u32 *eax, u32 *edx)
{
struct msr_command cmd;
+ int ret;
- if ( cpu == smp_processor_id() ) {
- return rdmsr_eio(reg, eax, edx);
- } else {
+ preempt_disable();
+ if ( is_current_cpu(cpu) )
+ ret = rdmsr_eio(reg, eax, edx);
+ else {
cmd.cpu = cpu;
cmd.reg = reg;
@ -148,9 +150,10 @
*eax = cmd.data[0];
*edx = cmd.data[1];
-
- return cmd.err;
+ ret = cmd.err;
}
+ preempt_enable();
+ return ret;
}
#else /* ! CONFIG_SMP */
diff -u --exclude-from=/home/me/.exclude -r linux-2.5.66-ref/include/linux/smp.h linux-2.5.66-uni/include/linux/smp.h
--- linux-2.5.66-ref/include/linux/smp.h Tue Mar 4 22:29:21 2003
+++ linux-2.5.66-uni/include/linux/smp.h Sat Apr 5 16:33:09 2003
@ -134,6 +134,12 @
}
#endif /* !SMP */
+ /* is_current_cpu() is not preempt-safe.
+ * Use 'cpu == get_cpu()' and then put_cpu()
+ * if preempt not already disabled.
+ */
+#define is_current_cpu(cpu) ((cpu) == smp_processor_id())
+
#define get_cpu() ({ preempt_disable(); smp_processor_id(); })
#define put_cpu() preempt_enable()
#define put_cpu_no_resched() preempt_enable_no_resched()
diff -u --exclude-from=/home/me/.exclude -r linux-2.5.66-ref/include/linux/threads.h linux-2.5.66-uni/include/linux/threads.h
--- linux-2.5.66-ref/include/linux/threads.h Tue Mar 4 22:28:55 2003
+++ linux-2.5.66-uni/include/linux/threads.h Sat Mar 29 11:01:55 2003
@ -20,6 +20,9 @
#define NR_CPUS 1
#endif
+#define FIRST_CPU 0
+#define LAST_CPU (NR_CPUS - 1)
+
#define MIN_THREADS_LEFT_FOR_ROOT 4
/*
--
Chuck
I am not a number!
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-05 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-05 22:17 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-05 10:24 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-05 18:56 ` Robert Love
2003-04-05 0:29 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-05 1:05 ` Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200304051719_MC3-1-3328-B238@compuserve.com \
--to=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®