mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
Cc: spstarr@sh0n.net, rml@tech9.net, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG][2.5.66bk9+] - tty hangings - patches, dmesg & sysctl+T info
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:56:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030408215651.503685ee.akpm@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52znn0mg3o.fsf@topspin.com>

Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com> wrote:
>
> Still, I like the idea of this patch, since it resolves the livelock.
> But I don't think the implementation is quite right.  insert_sequence
> doesn't get incremented until delayed_work_timer_fn().  That means
> that a driver (tty_io.c, for example) could call
> schedule_delayed_work(), then call flush_scheduled_work() before
> delayed_work_timer_fn() has run for that work.

The driver needs to run cancel_delayed_work() before calling
flush_scheduled_work().  The tty patch is already doing that, and I think
that plugs the holes.

Here's a full changelog.



The workqueue code currently has a notion of a per-cpu queue being "busy". 
flush_scheduled_work()'s responsibility is to wait for a queue to be not busy.

Problem is, flush_scheduled_work() can easily hang up.

- The workqueue is deemed "busy" when there are pending (timer-based)
  works.  But if someone repeatedly schedules new work in the delayed
  callback, the queue will never fall idle, and flush_scheduled_work() will
  not complete.

- If someone reschedules work (not delayed work) in the work function, that
  too will cause the queue to never go idle, and flush_scheduled_work() will
  not terminate.

So what this patch does is:

- Create a new "cancel_delayed_work()" which will try to kill off any
  timer-based works.

- Change flush_scheduled_work() so that it is immune to people re-adding
  work in the work callout handler.

  We can do this by recognising that the caller does *not* want to wait
  until the workqueue is "empty".  The caller merely wants to wait until all
  works which were pending at the time flush_scheduled_work() was called have
  completed.

  The patch uses a couple of sequence numbers for that.

So now, if someone wants to reliably remove delayed work they should do:


	/*
	 * Make sure that my work-callback will no longer schedule new work
	 */
	my_driver_is_shutting_down = 1;

	/*
	 * Kill off any pending delayed work
	 */
	cancel_delayed_work(&my_work);

	/*
	 * OK, there will be no new works scheduled.  But there may be one
	 * currently queued or in progress.  So wait for that to complete.
	 */
	flush_scheduled_work();

And change the flush_workqueue() sleep to be uninterruptible.  We worry that
delivery of a signal may cause the wait to return too early.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-09  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-06 20:09 [BUG][2.5.66bk9+] - changes to timers still broken - we don't oops anymore Shawn Starr
2003-04-06 20:20 ` Roland Dreier
2003-04-06 20:38 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-06 21:00   ` Shawn Starr
2003-04-09  2:12   ` [BUG][2.5.66bk9+] - tty hangings - patches, dmesg & sysctl+T info Shawn Starr
2003-04-09  4:12     ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-09  4:47       ` Roland Dreier
2003-04-09  4:56         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-04-09  4:16     ` Roland Dreier
2003-04-09  4:27       ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-09  4:52         ` Roland Dreier
2003-04-09  5:01           ` Shawn Starr
2003-04-12 16:08 Shawn Starr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030408215651.503685ee.akpm@digeo.com \
    --to=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=roland@topspin.com \
    --cc=spstarr@sh0n.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®