From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: zwane@linuxpower.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, Kai Germaschewski <kai.germaschewski@gmx.de>,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, "Nemosoft Unv." <nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl>,
davem@redhat.com
Subject: Re: SET_MODULE_OWNER?
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 13:23:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030409032537.547E32C06F@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 08 Apr 2003 21:03:00 -0400." <3E937144.9090105@pobox.com>
In message <3E937144.9090105@pobox.com> you write:
> Why don't you just let the maintainers apply the driver "cleanups" if
> they wish, or do not wish, like DaveM did. Only when that is
> accomplished is it reasonable to consider moving SET_MODULE_OWNER -- and
> only then if other people do not need it's obvious utility.
The please define when it should and should not be used, so everyone
knows.
Currently it seems to be:
/* This macro should be used on structures which had the owner field
added between 2.2 and 2.4, and not others. */
Is that correct?
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-09 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3E92515B.6030807@pobox.com>
2003-04-08 12:25 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Rusty Russell
2003-04-09 0:13 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? David S. Miller
2003-04-09 1:03 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jeff Garzik
2003-04-09 3:23 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2003-04-09 3:48 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jeff Garzik
2003-04-09 15:00 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Kai Germaschewski
[not found] <3E93AA3D.4050104@pobox.com>
2003-04-09 5:27 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Rusty Russell
2003-04-07 6:47 SET_MODULE_OWNER? Rusty Russell
2003-04-07 8:17 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-07 18:29 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jeff Garzik
2003-04-08 2:01 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Rusty Russell
2003-04-08 2:16 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-04-08 3:41 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Rusty Russell
2003-04-08 4:39 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jeff Garzik
2003-04-09 0:46 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Rusty Russell
2003-04-09 2:32 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jeff Garzik
2003-04-08 2:27 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jeff Garzik
2003-04-08 3:46 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Rusty Russell
2003-04-08 6:00 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Christoph Hellwig
2003-04-08 11:51 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Alan Cox
2003-04-08 14:46 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jamie Lokier
2003-04-08 15:12 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jeff Garzik
2003-04-08 16:45 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jamie Lokier
2003-04-08 17:19 ` SET_MODULE_OWNER? Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030409032537.547E32C06F@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kai.germaschewski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nemosoft@smcc.demon.nl \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®