From: hugang <hugang@soulinfo.com>
To: Willy TARREAU <willy@w.ods.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 19:17:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030501191730.76b9d986.hugang@soulinfo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030501102230.GA308@pcw.home.local>
On Thu, 1 May 2003 12:22:30 +0200
Willy TARREAU <willy@w.ods.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 01:16:05PM +0800, hugang wrote:
>
> > Here is table version of the fls. Yes it fast than other.
>
> Sorry, but this code returns wrong results. Test it with less
> iterations, it doesn't return the same result.
>
> > unsigned i = 0;
> >
> > do {
> > i++;
> > } while (n <= fls_table[i].max && n > fls_table[i].min);
>
> You never even compare with table[0] !
>
> > --test log is here----
>
> I recoded a table based on your idea, and it's clearly faster than others, and
> even faster than yours :
>
> ============
> static unsigned tbl[33] = { 2147483648, 1073741824, 536870912, 268435456,
> 134217728, 67108864, 33554432, 16777216,
> 8388608, 4194304, 2097152, 1048576,
> 524288, 262144, 131072, 65536,
> 32768, 16384, 8192, 4096,
> 2048, 1024, 512, 256,
> 128, 64, 32, 16,
> 8, 4, 2, 1, 0 };
>
>
> static inline int fls_tbl_fls(unsigned n)
> {
> unsigned i = 0;
>
> while (n < tbl[i])
> i++;
>
> return 32 - i;
> }
> ===========
Do see the mail by Andrew Morton? -----
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: hugang <hugang@soulinfo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 22:11:29 -0700
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu)
hugang <hugang@soulinfo.com> wrote:
>
> Here is table version of the fls. Yes it fast than other.
nooo.. That has a big cache footprint. At the very least you should use
a binary search. gcc will do it for you:
switch (n) {
case 0 ... 1:
return 1;
case 2 ... 3:
return 2;
case 4 ... 7:
return 3;
case 8 ... 15:
return 4;
etc.
----------
I agree him, The Lastest code my posted has works fine, Please check it.
--
Hu Gang / Steve
Email : huagng@soulinfo.com, steve@soulinfo.com
GPG FinePrint: 4099 3F1D AE01 1817 68F7 D499 A6C2 C418 86C8 610E
ICQ# : 205800361
Registered Linux User : 204016
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-01 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-30 2:46 Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 7:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-04-30 8:36 ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-04-30 8:43 ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-04-30 8:52 ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-04-30 8:51 ` P
2003-04-30 13:51 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 11:14 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 13:03 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 13:17 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 14:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 14:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 14:53 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 15:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 16:03 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 16:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 16:43 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 20:25 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-30 21:59 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 22:22 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-30 23:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 22:47 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-01 0:12 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-05-01 1:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 19:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 20:59 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-01 1:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-01 9:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-01 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-01 5:03 ` hugang
2003-05-01 5:11 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-01 5:33 ` hugang
2003-05-01 7:05 ` hugang
2003-05-01 13:52 ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 14:14 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-05-01 14:26 ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 14:53 ` hugang
2003-05-01 15:54 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-02 0:33 ` hugang
2003-05-01 17:16 ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 23:27 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-02 0:10 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-02 0:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-02 0:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-02 12:21 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-02 1:47 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-02 13:24 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-02 0:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-02 0:13 ` Lincoln Dale
2003-05-01 5:16 ` hugang
2003-05-01 10:22 ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 11:17 ` hugang [this message]
2003-05-01 11:45 ` Willy TARREAU
[not found] <87d6j34jad.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304301801210.20283-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-05-01 1:46 ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-01 4:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-01 12:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-02 5:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-01 13:31 linux
2003-05-01 17:15 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-02 8:50 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-02 9:37 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-05-02 10:04 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-02 22:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-03 2:21 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030501191730.76b9d986.hugang@soulinfo.com \
--to=hugang@soulinfo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@w.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®