mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hugang <hugang@soulinfo.com>
To: Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@uni-mannheim.de>
Cc: willy@w.ods.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@digeo.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 08:33:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030502083301.58827934.hugang@soulinfo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200305011754.33233.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de>

On Thu, 1 May 2003 17:54:28 +0200
Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On March 1, hugang wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 May 2003 15:52:04 +0200
> >
> > Willy TARREAU <willy@w.ods.org> wrote:
> > >  However, I have good news for you, the table code is 15% faster than my
> > > tree on an Alpha EV6 ;-)
> > >  It may be because gcc can use different tricks on this arch.
> > >
> > >  Cheers
> > >  Willy
> >
> > However, The most code changed has increase a little peformance, Do we
> > really need it?
> >
> > Here is test in my machine, The faster is still table.
> 
> I think the table version is so fast as a normal distribution of numbers is 
> tested. With this distribution half of the occuring values have the MSB set, 
> one quarter the next significant bit and so on...
> 
> The tree version is approximately equally fast for every number, but the table 
> version is fast if a very significant bit is set and slow if  a less 
> significant bit is set...
> 
> If small values occour more often than big ones the tree version should be 
> preferred, else following version may be very fast, too.
> 
> static inline int fls_shift(int x)
> {
> 	int bit = 32;
>  
> 	while(x > 0) {
> 		--bit;
> 		x <<= 1;
> 	}
> 
> 	return x ? bit : 0;
> }
> 

Yes, The shift is very faster than other. Here is a test in P4 1.6G.

model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 Mobile CPU 1.60GHz
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs
gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
==== -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 ====
test_fls.c: In function `fls_tree_fls':
test_fls.c:85: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `t'
4294967295 iterations of nil... checksum = 4294967295

real    0m21.698s
user    0m21.650s
sys     0m0.000s
4294967295 iterations of table... checksum = 4294967265

real    0m41.581s
user    0m41.500s
sys     0m0.000s
4294967295 iterations of tree... checksum = 4294967265

real    1m1.173s
user    1m1.040s
sys     0m0.000s
4294967295 iterations of shift... checksum = 4294967265

real    0m22.050s
user    0m22.000s
sys     0m0.010s



-- 
Hu Gang / Steve
Email        : huagng@soulinfo.com, steve@soulinfo.com
GPG FinePrint: 4099 3F1D AE01 1817 68F7  D499 A6C2 C418 86C8 610E
ICQ#         : 205800361
Registered Linux User : 204016

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-02  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-30  2:46 Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30  7:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-04-30  8:36   ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-04-30  8:43     ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-04-30  8:52     ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-04-30  8:51       ` P
2003-04-30 13:51   ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 11:14 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 13:03   ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 13:17     ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 14:07       ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 14:11   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 14:53     ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 15:28       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 16:03         ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 16:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 16:43             ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 20:25             ` Alan Cox
2003-04-30 21:59               ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 22:22                 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-30 23:41               ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 22:47                 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-01  0:12                 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-05-01  1:07                   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 19:15     ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 20:59       ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-01  1:02         ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-01  9:19           ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-01 16:02             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-01  5:03   ` hugang
2003-05-01  5:11     ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-01  5:33       ` hugang
2003-05-01  7:05         ` hugang
2003-05-01 13:52           ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 14:14             ` Falk Hueffner
2003-05-01 14:26               ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 14:53             ` hugang
2003-05-01 15:54               ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-02  0:33                 ` hugang [this message]
2003-05-01 17:16               ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 23:27                 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-02  0:10                   ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-02  0:43                     ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-02  0:54                       ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-02 12:21                         ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-02  1:47                       ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-02 13:24                         ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-02  0:13                   ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-02  0:13             ` Lincoln Dale
2003-05-01  5:16   ` hugang
2003-05-01 10:22     ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 11:17       ` hugang
2003-05-01 11:45         ` Willy TARREAU
     [not found] <87d6j34jad.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304301801210.20283-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-05-01  1:46   ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-01  4:40     ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-01 12:00       ` David S. Miller
2003-05-02  5:14         ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-01 13:31 linux
2003-05-01 17:15 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-02  8:50 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-02  9:37 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-05-02 10:04 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-02 22:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-03  2:21 Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030502083301.58827934.hugang@soulinfo.com \
    --to=hugang@soulinfo.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schlicht@uni-mannheim.de \
    --cc=willy@w.ods.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®