* Re: recursive spinlock. Shoot.
@ 2003-05-19 9:59 Samium Gromoff
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Samium Gromoff @ 2003-05-19 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Not that my opinion matters much, but my feeling is that such measures
are very much of the bandaid taste, the ones which in the end piled one on another
end up obscuring the very problems in the code.
In short, it`ll probably make _filling_in_ the code easier, but the effect is
that it will shift the balance towards crap accumulation.
To me, that is the damage of the kind which is very hard to undo.
regards, Samium Gromoff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-05-19 10:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-19 9:59 recursive spinlock. Shoot Samium Gromoff
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®