* [PATCH] spin_lock_irq debugging
@ 2003-05-21 20:08 Duncan Sands
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Duncan Sands @ 2003-05-21 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Of course the real problem is the corresponding spin_unlock_irq
enabling local irqs when they should have been left disabled, but
this is easier to check for. Your logs will fill up.
diff -Nru a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h Wed May 21 22:04:29 2003
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h Wed May 21 22:04:29 2003
@@ -261,6 +261,10 @@
#define spin_lock_irq(lock) \
do { \
+ if (unlikely(irqs_disabled())) { \
+ printk(KERN_ERR "bad: spin_lock_irq with irqs disabled!\n"); \
+ dump_stack(); \
+ } \
local_irq_disable(); \
preempt_disable(); \
_raw_spin_lock(lock); \
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-05-21 19:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-21 20:08 [PATCH] spin_lock_irq debugging Duncan Sands
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®