* [TRIVIAL] [2.5 patch] small documentation apdate regarding supported gcc versions
@ 2003-05-26 6:32 Rusty Trivial Russell
2003-05-26 7:04 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Trivial Russell @ 2003-05-26 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel
[ Looks correct given the check in init/main.c. --RR ]
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
The patch below against 2.5.68-bk11 contains a small documentation
apdate regarding supported gcc versions.
cu
Adrian
--- trivial-2.5.69-bk18/README.orig 2003-05-26 16:17:24.000000000 +1000
+++ trivial-2.5.69-bk18/README 2003-05-26 16:17:24.000000000 +1000
@@ -152,9 +152,8 @@
COMPILING the kernel:
- - Make sure you have gcc 2.95.3 available.
- gcc 2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2), and gcc 2.7.2.3 are known to miscompile
- some parts of the kernel, and are *no longer supported*.
+ - Make sure you have gcc >= 2.95.3 available. *gcc 2.7.2.3 and gcc 2.91.66
+ (egcs-1.1.2) are no longer supported*.
Also remember to upgrade your binutils package (for as/ld/nm and company)
if necessary. For more information, refer to ./Documentation/Changes.
--- trivial-2.5.69-bk18/Documentation/Changes.orig 2003-05-26 16:17:24.000000000 +1000
+++ trivial-2.5.69-bk18/Documentation/Changes 2003-05-26 16:17:24.000000000 +1000
@@ -76,15 +76,13 @@
information about their gcc version requirements from another source.
The recommended compiler for the kernel is gcc 2.95.x (x >= 3), and it
-should be used when you need absolute stability. You may use gcc 3.0.x
+should be used when you need absolute stability. You may use gcc 3.x
instead if you wish, although it may cause problems. Later versions of gcc
have not received much testing for Linux kernel compilation, and there are
almost certainly bugs (mainly, but not exclusively, in the kernel) that
will need to be fixed in order to use these compilers. In any case, using
pgcc instead of plain gcc is just asking for trouble.
-gcc 2.91.66 (egcs-1.1.2) continues to be supported for SPARC64 requirements.
-
The Red Hat gcc 2.96 compiler subtree can also be used to build this tree.
You should ensure you use gcc-2.96-74 or later. gcc-2.96-54 will not build
the kernel correctly.
--
What is this? http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/trivial/
Don't blame me: the Monkey is driving
File: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>: [2.5 patch] small documentation apdate regarding supported gcc versions
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [TRIVIAL] [2.5 patch] small documentation apdate regarding supported gcc versions
2003-05-26 6:32 [TRIVIAL] [2.5 patch] small documentation apdate regarding supported gcc versions Rusty Trivial Russell
@ 2003-05-26 7:04 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2003-05-26 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rusty; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel, akpm
From: Rusty Trivial Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 16:32:04 +1000
[ Looks correct given the check in init/main.c. --RR ]
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
The patch below against 2.5.68-bk11 contains a small documentation
apdate regarding supported gcc versions.
Andrew merged in a similar patch today, I bet this one won't
apply.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-26 6:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-26 6:32 [TRIVIAL] [2.5 patch] small documentation apdate regarding supported gcc versions Rusty Trivial Russell
2003-05-26 7:04 ` David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®