From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Samuel Thibault <Samuel.Thibault@ens-lyon.fr>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>,
torvalds@transmeta.com, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.5 PATCH] bug if cpufreq driver initialization fails
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:16:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030615191650.J5417@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030615180435.GC686@bouh.unh.edu>; from Samuel.Thibault@ens-lyon.fr on Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 02:04:36PM -0400
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 02:04:36PM -0400, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I hence modified drivers/base/sys.c to have sysdev_driver_register()
> fail as well, and then I also had to modify kernel/cpufreq.c, because
> this failure did not imply a setting cpufreq_driver to NULL (preventing
> me from reinsmoding speedstep-ich: EBUSY)
Unfortunately, you created a by by doing so. Eg:
- you have 3 devices on kset.list.
- you successfully register 2 of them with a driver.
- you fail one.
- sysdev_driver_register returns failure.
- module is unloaded while other parts of the kernel have references into
the driver.
- the kernel oopses.
> I'd also suggest that the speedstep drivers printks something if
> everything went ok (including the cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo()
> call), the low & high speed for instance, just to be sure everything
> went ok
IMO its better to printk something on failure.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-15 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-08 8:22 [2.5. PATCH] cpufreq: correct initialization on Intel Coppermines Dominik Brodowski
2003-06-14 8:46 ` Samuel Thibault
[not found] ` <20030614095646.GA1702@brodo.de>
[not found] ` <20030614214943.GA4073@bouh.unh.edu>
[not found] ` <20030615095044.GD2009@brodo.de>
2003-06-15 18:04 ` [2.5 PATCH] bug if cpufreq driver initialization fails Samuel Thibault
2003-06-15 18:16 ` Russell King [this message]
2003-06-15 18:25 ` Samuel Thibault
2003-06-15 18:48 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030615191650.J5417@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Samuel.Thibault@ens-lyon.fr \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®