mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Samuel Thibault <Samuel.Thibault@ens-lyon.fr>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>,
	torvalds@transmeta.com, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.5 PATCH] bug if cpufreq driver initialization fails
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:48:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030615194838.M5417@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030615182507.GE686@bouh.unh.edu>; from Samuel.Thibault@ens-lyon.fr on Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 02:25:07PM -0400

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 02:25:07PM -0400, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Le dim 15 jun 2003 19:16:50 GMT, Russell King a tapoté sur son clavier :
> > On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 02:04:36PM -0400, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > I hence modified drivers/base/sys.c to have sysdev_driver_register()
> > > fail as well, and then I also had to modify kernel/cpufreq.c, because
> > > this failure did not imply a setting cpufreq_driver to NULL (preventing
> > > me from reinsmoding speedstep-ich: EBUSY)
> > 
> > Unfortunately, you created a by by doing so.  Eg:
> > 
> > - you have 3 devices on kset.list.
> > - you successfully register 2 of them with a driver.
> > - you fail one.
> > - sysdev_driver_register returns failure.
> > - module is unloaded while other parts of the kernel have references into
> >   the driver.
> > - the kernel oopses.
> Ok, that's what I was wondering, might an exit loop removing the already
> added driver be done?
> 
> (the second half of the patch might still be applied as soon as now)

Also, I think people need to consider whether "all devices failed"
or "any device failed" counts as overall failure.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


      reply	other threads:[~2003-06-15 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-08  8:22 [2.5. PATCH] cpufreq: correct initialization on Intel Coppermines Dominik Brodowski
2003-06-14  8:46 ` Samuel Thibault
     [not found]   ` <20030614095646.GA1702@brodo.de>
     [not found]     ` <20030614214943.GA4073@bouh.unh.edu>
     [not found]       ` <20030615095044.GD2009@brodo.de>
2003-06-15 18:04         ` [2.5 PATCH] bug if cpufreq driver initialization fails Samuel Thibault
2003-06-15 18:16           ` Russell King
2003-06-15 18:25             ` Samuel Thibault
2003-06-15 18:48               ` Russell King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030615194838.M5417@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=Samuel.Thibault@ens-lyon.fr \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®