* Bug in Linux 2.5.74 IPv6 routing
@ 2003-07-09 17:52 Jean-Luc Richier
2003-07-09 18:31 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Luc Richier @ 2003-07-09 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pekkas; +Cc: linux-kernel
There is a bug in IPv6 route calculation since kernel 2.5.71. It affects
all routes with prefix length != 0 (mod 8)
The bug is as follows:
do: ip -6 route add 2000::/3 via 2001:688:121:10::1
ip -6 route
It shows a route for ::/3, not for 2000::/3
The bug was introduced when changing function ipv6_addr_prefix to inline
status (and moving it from net/ipv6/route.c to include/net/ipv6.h).
At the same time the = and the memset in the function have been swapped.
(cf patch 1 below). With the new code, with a prefix length = 3, the
function first sets the correct value in pfx->s6_addr[0] and AFTER does a
memset(pfx->s6_addr + 0, 0, 16 - 0) which overwrites pfx->s6_addr[0].
The previous was doing the memset first.
There are 2 solutions to correct this bug:
- The first solution is to restore the order between = and memset (see patch 1).
But I suppose that there is a reason for this swap. In fact the old code does
not work if the 2 addr arguments are equal, the new code (corrected) works.
- So I suggest an other solution (see patch 2): if the prefix length is not
0 mod 8, increase o, as pfx->s6_addr[o) is already set.
PATCH 1: (reverse to previous code)
--- linux-2.5.74/include/net/ipv6.h.DIST 2003-07-02 22:53:44.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.5.74/include/net/ipv6.h 2003-07-09 19:03:13.195128011 +0200
@@ -276,10 +276,10 @@
b = plen & 0x7;
memcpy(pfx->s6_addr, addr, o);
- if (b != 0)
- pfx->s6_addr[o] = addr->s6_addr[o] & (0xff00 >> b);
if (o < 16)
memset(pfx->s6_addr + o, 0, 16 - o);
+ if (b != 0)
+ pfx->s6_addr[o] = addr->s6_addr[o] & (0xff00 >> b);
}
#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_ADDR_SET
PATCH 2: avoid overwriting the set value
--- linux-2.5.74/include/net/ipv6.h.DIST 2003-07-02 22:53:44.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.5.74/include/net/ipv6.h 2003-07-09 18:51:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -276,8 +276,10 @@
b = plen & 0x7;
memcpy(pfx->s6_addr, addr, o);
- if (b != 0)
+ if (b != 0) {
pfx->s6_addr[o] = addr->s6_addr[o] & (0xff00 >> b);
+ o++;
+ }
if (o < 16)
memset(pfx->s6_addr + o, 0, 16 - o);
}
--
Jean-Luc RICHIER (Jean-Luc.Richier@Imag.Fr richier@imag.fr)
Laboratoire Logiciels, Systemes et Reseaux (LSR-IMAG)
IMAG-CAMPUS, BP 72, F-38402 St Martin d'Heres Cedex
Tel : +33 4 76 82 72 32 Fax : +33 4 76 82 72 87
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug in Linux 2.5.74 IPv6 routing
2003-07-09 17:52 Bug in Linux 2.5.74 IPv6 routing Jean-Luc Richier
@ 2003-07-09 18:31 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 @ 2003-07-09 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean-Luc.Richier; +Cc: pekkas, linux-kernel, netdev, yoshfuji
CC: netdev
In article <20030709195237.A8550@horus.imag.fr> (at Wed, 9 Jul 2003 19:52:37 +0200), Jean-Luc Richier <Jean-Luc.Richier@imag.fr> says:
> There is a bug in IPv6 route calculation since kernel 2.5.71. It affects
> all routes with prefix length != 0 (mod 8)
> The bug is as follows:
> do: ip -6 route add 2000::/3 via 2001:688:121:10::1
> ip -6 route
> It shows a route for ::/3, not for 2000::/3
good catch.
> PATCH 2: avoid overwriting the set value
> --- linux-2.5.74/include/net/ipv6.h.DIST 2003-07-02 22:53:44.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.5.74/include/net/ipv6.h 2003-07-09 18:51:25.000000000 +0200
> @@ -276,8 +276,10 @@
> b = plen & 0x7;
>
> memcpy(pfx->s6_addr, addr, o);
> - if (b != 0)
> + if (b != 0) {
> pfx->s6_addr[o] = addr->s6_addr[o] & (0xff00 >> b);
> + o++;
> + }
> if (o < 16)
> memset(pfx->s6_addr + o, 0, 16 - o);
> }
>
Ok, let's use this one.
--yoshfuji
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-09 18:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-09 17:52 Bug in Linux 2.5.74 IPv6 routing Jean-Luc Richier
2003-07-09 18:31 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®