* CONFIG_QFMT_V2 vs. `VFS v0 quota format support'
@ 2003-07-10 15:50 Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-10 15:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2003-07-10 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Linux Kernel Development
Why does the help text for CONFIG_QFMT_V2 say `VFS v0 quota format support' and
not `VFS v2 quota format support'?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: CONFIG_QFMT_V2 vs. `VFS v0 quota format support'
2003-07-10 15:50 CONFIG_QFMT_V2 vs. `VFS v0 quota format support' Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2003-07-10 15:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-10 18:51 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2003-07-10 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven, jack; +Cc: Linux Kernel Development
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:50:33PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Why does the help text for CONFIG_QFMT_V2 say `VFS v0 quota format support' and
> not `VFS v2 quota format support'?
Ask Jan, that's the name he's been using all through the development of
the patch and in the quota tools.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: CONFIG_QFMT_V2 vs. `VFS v0 quota format support'
2003-07-10 15:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2003-07-10 18:51 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2003-07-10 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig, Geert Uytterhoeven, jack, Linux Kernel Development
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 05:50:33PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> > Why does the help text for CONFIG_QFMT_V2 say `VFS v0 quota format support' and
> > not `VFS v2 quota format support'?
>
> Ask Jan, that's the name he's been using all through the development of
> the patch and in the quota tools.
At the beginning I started calling the original quota format 'old' and
the new one 'v0' (because in the quota file there's written 0 in the
version field ;)). If I did the decision now I would name it
differently...
In the code on the other hand I started naming the formats v1 and v2
because internal type identifiers are '1' and '2'.
So I agree that this is a bit messy but I'm not sure it's worth
renaming.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-10 18:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-10 15:50 CONFIG_QFMT_V2 vs. `VFS v0 quota format support' Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-10 15:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-10 18:51 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®