From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
e0206@foo21.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [Patch][RFC] epoll and half closed TCP connections
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 02:41:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030714014135.GA22769@mail.jlokier.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307131542000.15022@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Yes, this could be improved though. If we could only pass our event
> interest mask to f_op->poll() the function will be able to register it
> inside the wait queue structure and release only waiters that matches the
> available condition.
It's not a bad idea.
> > And ttys? They are problematic, because ttys can return EOF _after_
> > returning data without closing (and without being hung-up). An epoll
> > loop which is reading a tty (and isn't programmed specially for a tty)
> > _must_ receive POLLRDHUP when the EOF is pending, else it may hang.
>
> Please replace 'it may hung' with 'it may hung if it is using the read()
> return bytes check trick' ;)
Sure - but take an app that is normally using TCP sockets and give it
an AF_UNIX socket.. Something as general as the event loop
_shouldn't_ have to depend on that subtlety.
Ok that's avoidable, but it's a trap. It would be nice to get a flag
that doesn't have a caveat in the manual saying "this flag only works
(at present) on TCP sockets in kernels >= 2.5.76. Take care not to
use the optimisation for any other kind of fd including other sockets,
as it will break your app...". That's not the sort of thing I want to
see in the epoll manual page :)
Anyway, there is a correct answer and I have made the patch so wait
for next mail... :)
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-14 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-12 18:16 Eric Varsanyi
2003-07-12 19:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-12 20:51 ` Eric Varsanyi
2003-07-12 20:48 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 21:19 ` Eric Varsanyi
2003-07-12 21:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 21:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 23:11 ` Eric Varsanyi
2003-07-12 23:55 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 1:05 ` Eric Varsanyi
2003-07-13 20:32 ` David Schwartz
2003-07-13 21:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 23:05 ` David Schwartz
2003-07-13 23:09 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 8:14 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 15:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 1:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 21:14 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 23:05 ` David Schwartz
2003-07-13 23:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 23:52 ` Entrope
2003-07-14 6:14 ` David Schwartz
2003-07-14 7:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 1:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 6:14 ` David Schwartz
2003-07-15 20:27 ` James Antill
2003-07-16 1:46 ` David Schwartz
2003-07-16 2:09 ` James Antill
2003-07-13 13:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 16:55 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-12 20:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 5:24 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-13 14:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 17:00 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-13 19:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-13 23:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 1:41 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2003-07-14 2:24 ` POLLRDONCE optimisation for epoll users (was: epoll and half closed TCP connections) Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 2:37 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 2:43 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 2:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 3:02 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 3:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 3:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 3:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 4:00 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 5:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 6:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 6:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 3:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 3:17 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 3:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 3:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 3:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 3:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-14 17:09 ` [Patch][RFC] epoll and half closed TCP connections kuznet
2003-07-14 17:09 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-14 21:45 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030714014135.GA22769@mail.jlokier.co.uk \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=e0206@foo21.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®