* Re: ptrace or procfs for gdb?
[not found] <000801c35832$a423e210$3cbd5ada@karl>
@ 2003-08-01 14:43 ` Zack Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Zack Brown @ 2003-08-01 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marx; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi Marx,
The linux-kernel mailing list is the best place for these kinds of
questions. (CCed)
Good luck,
Zack
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:41:40PM +0800, Marx wrote:
> I look over your "kernel Traffic".
> Now, May I discuss something about procfs with you?
>
> Why does Linux support gdb with ptrace, not procfs?
>
> I've developed debugger for servel years,I prefer procfs rather than
> ptrace.
--
Zack Brown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-08-01 14:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <000801c35832$a423e210$3cbd5ada@karl>
2003-08-01 14:43 ` ptrace or procfs for gdb? Zack Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®