From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, devik@cdi.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow /dev/{,k}mem to be disabled to prevent kernel from being modified easily
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 21:18:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030803191833.GA13803@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030803191102.GA29616@alpha.home.local>
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 09:11:02PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Why not make this change dynamic instead ? eg : your system boots unlocked,
> and definitely locks /dev/{,k}mem once you do something such as
>
> echo foo > /proc/path_to_magic_entry
I thought about something like that but then for loading modules too - which
would allow for a modular boot but a lock afterwards.
> So the same config can be used with kernel with and without X, it's just a
> matter of runtime configuration. It could even be a sysctl, as long as there's
> no way to unset it.
Well, I fear the runtime overhead - as it is, I suspect this patch is
somewhat inflamatory anyhow ('tough luck you were hacked', 'you are fscked
anyhow').
However, the check would be in {,k}mem_open and in sys_init_module, which
are not heavily used functions.
I'll whip up a dynamic patch soonish - I'm unsure about the right location,
/proc/sys/ something?
Thanks.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-03 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-03 18:09 bert hubert
2003-08-03 19:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-03 19:18 ` bert hubert [this message]
2003-08-03 20:26 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-08-03 21:37 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-03 19:32 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-03 20:45 ` bert hubert
2003-08-03 20:52 ` Wichert Akkerman
2003-08-03 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-03 21:33 ` David Lang
2003-08-03 21:47 ` bert hubert
2003-08-04 13:10 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-03 20:14 ` Matan Ziv-Av
2003-08-03 21:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-03 21:08 ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-04 12:30 ` eliezer
2003-08-04 9:37 ` devik
2003-08-04 13:46 ` bert hubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030803191833.GA13803@outpost.ds9a.nl \
--to=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=devik@cdi.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@w.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®