From: Scott Chapman <scott_list@mischko.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Plans for better performance metrics in upcoming kernels?
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:41:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309051641.44228.scott_list@mischko.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm wondering what the plans are for more accurate and more useful performance
metrics in upcoming kernels.
CPU Utilization by process is apparently a known-inaccuracy.
There are no disk I/O metrics per process.
CPU Queue Length doesn't appear to be available?
Etc.
Linux clearly falls behind the competition in this area. It makes it rather
tough to do system performance analysis on a Linux box! :-)
Is there a plan to deal with these issues? ETA's?
Cordially,
Scott
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-05 23:41 Scott Chapman [this message]
2003-09-06 7:28 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-08 14:54 ` Scott Chapman
2003-09-08 22:27 ` Craig Thomas
2003-09-08 22:51 ` Cliff White
2003-09-08 23:15 ` Peter Chubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200309051641.44228.scott_list@mischko.com \
--to=scott_list@mischko.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome