mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Chapman <scott_list@mischko.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Plans for better performance metrics in upcoming kernels?
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:54:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309080754.55700.scott_list@mischko.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309051641.44228.scott_list@mischko.com>

Hi all,

I received one reply to this email.  I take it there is nobody really heading 
up the implementation of improved/missing performance metrics in the kernel?

Is this on anyone's radar?

What is Linus' take on more/better metrics?  
Is he likely to roll them in if they are implemented?

Is there any plan to implement any existing patches? 

If I can get developer time applied to this project, I don't want to re-invent 
the existing pieces.  Who do I coordinate with?

Cordially,
Scott

On Friday 05 September 2003 16:41, Scott Chapman wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm wondering what the plans are for more accurate and more useful
> performance metrics in upcoming kernels.
>
> CPU Utilization by process is apparently a known-inaccuracy.
>
> There are no disk I/O metrics per process.
>
> CPU Queue Length doesn't appear to be available?
>
> Etc.
>
> Linux clearly falls behind the competition in this area. It makes it rather
> tough to do system performance analysis on a Linux box!  :-)
>
> Is there a plan to deal with these issues?  ETA's?
>
> Cordially,
> Scott


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-08 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-05 23:41 Scott Chapman
2003-09-06  7:28 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-08 14:54 ` Scott Chapman [this message]
2003-09-08 22:27   ` Craig Thomas
2003-09-08 22:51     ` Cliff White
2003-09-08 23:15   ` Peter Chubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200309080754.55700.scott_list@mischko.com \
    --to=scott_list@mischko.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome