From: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] frandom - fast random generator module
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:35:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031016233533.GD29279@pegasys.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F8F23BE.7020703@users.sf.net>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:03:26AM +0200, Eli Billauer wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:29:05AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >
> >>So, given that trend and also given the existing /dev/[u]random, I
> >>disagree completely: /dev/frandom is the perfect example of something
> >>that should _not_ be in the kernel. If you want /dev/urandom faster,
> >>then solve _that_ problem. Don't try to solve a /dev/urandom problem by
> >>creating something totally new.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I have some performance fixes for /dev/urandom, but there's a fair
> >amount of other cleanup that has to go in first.
> >
> ... and this reminded me that I originally wanted to patch random.c, and
> change the algorithm to the faster one. To my best understanding, there
> would be no degradation in random quality, assuming I would do it
> correctly (and not being hung for the nerve to do it). But that's the
> problem: What if I got something wrong?
>
> If a hardware device driver is buggy, you usually know about it sooner
> or later. If an RNG has a rare bug, or an architecture-dependent flaw,
> it's much harder to notice. If the RNG starts to repeat itself, you
> won't know about it, unless you happened to test exactly that data. The
> algorithm may be perfect, but a silly bug can blow it all.
>
> So personally, I wouldn't touch the urandom code, not even the smallest
> fix. Instead, I decided to write another RNG, which doesn't interfere
> with the existing one. The only way to be confident about it, is to give
> it mileage. And that means making it available for broad use.
>
> Which is why I originally offered frandom as a supplement, not an
> alternative.
Sounds like a case for having a config choice for which
urandom code to build in.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: jw@pegasys.ws
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-16 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-16 8:22 Eli Billauer
2003-10-16 8:36 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-16 10:20 ` Eli Billauer
2003-10-16 10:48 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-16 11:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-16 12:27 ` Eli Billauer
2003-10-16 15:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-16 16:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-16 16:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-16 18:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-16 18:52 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-10-16 19:31 ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-16 20:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-16 21:03 ` David Wagner
2003-10-16 23:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-16 23:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-17 0:34 ` David Wagner
2003-10-16 17:45 ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-16 18:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-16 19:08 ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-16 20:27 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-16 20:37 ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-16 17:31 ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-16 23:03 ` Eli Billauer
2003-10-16 23:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-16 23:13 ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-16 23:35 ` jw schultz [this message]
2003-10-21 19:24 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-21 19:55 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-21 21:21 ` Helge Hafting
2003-10-21 22:18 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-22 1:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-10-21 19:17 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-21 21:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-10-21 22:08 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-22 1:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-10-22 2:56 ` jw schultz
2003-10-22 16:22 ` Kent Borg
2003-10-23 2:46 ` Dale Farnsworth
2003-10-23 3:22 ` Sandy Harris
2003-10-23 14:15 ` Kent Borg
2003-10-24 17:37 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-24 17:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-10-24 20:59 ` David Wagner
2003-10-24 21:33 ` jw schultz
2003-10-22 3:49 ` Sandy Harris
2003-10-16 10:45 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-10-21 19:30 ` bill davidsen
[not found] <HbGf.8rL.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <HbQ5.ep.27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <Hdyv.2Vd.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <HeE6.4Cc.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <HjaT.3nN.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <Hjkw.3Al.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-10-16 17:46 ` David Mosberger-Tang
2003-10-16 19:28 ` Eli Billauer
2003-10-16 20:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-10-21 19:46 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-16 21:30 ` Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031016233533.GD29279@pegasys.ws \
--to=jw@pegasys.ws \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome