From: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide write barrier support
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:36:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031024093635.GA22894@hh.idb.hist.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310231920.39888.phillips@arcor.de>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 07:20:39PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> These are essentially the same, they both rely on draining the downstream
> queues. But if we could keep the downstream queues full, bus transfers for
> post-barrier writes will overlap the media transfers for pre-barrier writes,
> which would seem to be worth some extra effort.
>
> To keep the downstream queues full, we must submit write barriers to all the
> downstream devices and not wait for completion. That is, as soon as a
> barrier is issued to a given downstream device we can start passing through
> post-barrier writes to it.
>
This approach may fail:
a. Some pre-barrier writes go to all devices
b. barrier is sent to all devices
c. Post-barrier writes go to all devices
d. drive 1 commits all its pre-barrier writes, then
commits its post-barrier writes.
e. drive 2 is slow and havent done the pre-barrier writes yet
f. power is lost - leaving inconsistent devices.
The problem is that drive 1 don't know wether drive 2
did the barrier yet.
Helge Hafting
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-24 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-13 14:08 Jens Axboe
2003-10-13 15:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-13 15:35 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-13 15:37 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-13 22:39 ` Matthias Andree
2003-10-14 0:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-16 10:36 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-16 10:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-16 10:48 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-13 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-14 6:48 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-15 3:40 ` Greg Stark
2003-10-16 7:10 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-20 17:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-20 19:56 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-20 23:46 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-21 5:40 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-23 16:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-23 16:23 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-23 17:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-23 23:21 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-26 21:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-27 10:29 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-27 21:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-24 9:36 ` Helge Hafting [this message]
2003-10-26 15:38 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-16 16:51 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-16 20:43 ` Greg Stark
2003-10-17 6:44 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-17 6:46 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-16 20:51 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-17 6:48 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-17 16:07 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-17 18:08 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-17 17:59 Manfred Spraul
2003-10-17 18:06 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-21 0:47 ` Matthias Andree
2003-10-17 18:42 Mudama, Eric
[not found] <IXzh.61g.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-10-21 19:24 ` Anton Ertl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031024093635.GA22894@hh.idb.hist.no \
--to=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome