* 2.6.1-rc1 arch/i386/kernel/setup.c wrong parameter order to request resources ?
@ 2004-01-04 15:39 Arjan van de Ven
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401041305440.2162@home.osdl.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2004-01-04 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: torvalds, akpm, davej
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --]
Hi,
in setup.c the kernel tries to reserve ram resources for system ram etc
etc. However it seems it's done with the parameters to request_resource in
the wrong order (it certainly is opposite order from other neighboring
code). Can someone confirm I'm not overlooking something?
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
--- linux-2.6.0/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c~ 2004-01-04 16:37:34.622450000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.0/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c 2004-01-04 16:37:34.622450000 +0100
@@ -834,8 +834,8 @@
* so we try it repeatedly and let the resource manager
* test it.
*/
- request_resource(res, &code_resource);
- request_resource(res, &data_resource);
+ request_resource(&code_resource, res);
+ request_resource(&data_resource, res);
}
}
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401041305440.2162@home.osdl.org>]
* Re: 2.6.1-rc1 arch/i386/kernel/setup.c wrong parameter order to request resources ? [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401041305440.2162@home.osdl.org> @ 2004-01-04 22:00 ` Arjan van de Ven 2004-03-29 15:43 ` Arjan van de Ven 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2004-01-04 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, davej [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 927 bytes --] On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 01:08:52PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > in setup.c the kernel tries to reserve ram resources for system ram etc > > etc. However it seems it's done with the parameters to request_resource in > > the wrong order (it certainly is opposite order from other neighboring > > code). Can someone confirm I'm not overlooking something? > > You've overlooked something. > > The core uses the rigth order: it's literally trying to find _which_ of > the e820 resources contains the "code" and "data" resource. > > In other words: the code and data resources don't contain anything. They > are contained _in_ something, but we don't know which one off-hand, so we > try to register them in all the memory resources we find. > and not used for anything else. ok fair enough; maybe deserves more comment but it makes sense. [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.1-rc1 arch/i386/kernel/setup.c wrong parameter order to request resources ? [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401041305440.2162@home.osdl.org> 2004-01-04 22:00 ` Arjan van de Ven @ 2004-03-29 15:43 ` Arjan van de Ven 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2004-03-29 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Administrator; +Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, davej [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 927 bytes --] On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 01:08:52PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > in setup.c the kernel tries to reserve ram resources for system ram etc > > etc. However it seems it's done with the parameters to request_resource in > > the wrong order (it certainly is opposite order from other neighboring > > code). Can someone confirm I'm not overlooking something? > > You've overlooked something. > > The core uses the rigth order: it's literally trying to find _which_ of > the e820 resources contains the "code" and "data" resource. > > In other words: the code and data resources don't contain anything. They > are contained _in_ something, but we don't know which one off-hand, so we > try to register them in all the memory resources we find. > and not used for anything else. ok fair enough; maybe deserves more comment but it makes sense. [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* 2.6.1-rc1 arch/i386/kernel/setup.c wrong parameter order to request resources ? @ 2004-03-29 15:42 Arjan van de Ven 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2004-03-29 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Administrator; +Cc: torvalds, akpm, davej [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --] Hi, in setup.c the kernel tries to reserve ram resources for system ram etc etc. However it seems it's done with the parameters to request_resource in the wrong order (it certainly is opposite order from other neighboring code). Can someone confirm I'm not overlooking something? Greetings, Arjan van de Ven --- linux-2.6.0/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c~ 2004-01-04 16:37:34.622450000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.0/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c 2004-01-04 16:37:34.622450000 +0100 @@ -834,8 +834,8 @@ * so we try it repeatedly and let the resource manager * test it. */ - request_resource(res, &code_resource); - request_resource(res, &data_resource); + request_resource(&code_resource, res); + request_resource(&data_resource, res); } } [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-29 15:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-04 15:39 2.6.1-rc1 arch/i386/kernel/setup.c wrong parameter order to request resources ? Arjan van de Ven
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401041305440.2162@home.osdl.org>
2004-01-04 22:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-29 15:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-29 15:42 Arjan van de Ven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome