mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.1-rc1-tiny1 tree for small systems
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:49:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040110214930.GM18208@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1wu82i6tm.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:22:29PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:00:49PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > On the side of useless ugly.  But interesting in what I had to touch
> > > the following patch is a first crude stab at removing block device
> > > support from the kernel.
> > 
> > This looks good. If you can send me a version with
> > /BLOCK_DEVICE/BLOCK/, etc., I'll put it in.
> 
> Ok.  I have just had a chance to clean some things up.  Attached
> is my latest and hopefully clean set up diffs against 2.6.1-rc1-tiny1
> 
> I am bouncing this off of linux-kernel as well since I got such good
> feedback last time.
> 
> - First the compile fixes, so I can compile test this code.

Ok, had this stuff in my last release.

> - Then the CONFIG_BLOCK patch.  

Merged with some minor tweaks in 2.6.1-tiny1.

> - Then a new patch that was sort of in my tree to make BINFMT_SCRIPT
>   configurable.

Merged.

> - And another new patch to use cond_syscall instead of explicit
>   dummies when we don't have the AIO code compiled in.

I went back and cleaned up all my syscall changes to use the
cond_syscall approach, thanks for pointing it out.

-- 
Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-10 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-03  3:08 Matt Mackall
2004-01-04  7:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-04  8:40   ` Matt Mackall
2004-01-04 16:02     ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-05  0:00     ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-05  0:34       ` viro
2004-01-05  4:34         ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]       ` <20040105170938.GY18208@waste.org>
2004-01-08 19:22         ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-09 20:15           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2004-01-10 21:49           ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2004-01-08 21:04     ` bill davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040110214930.GM18208@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome