* [2.6.2-rc1] sleep called from invalid context (8250/ACPI related?)
@ 2004-01-21 11:40 Rui Saraiva
2004-01-21 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rui Saraiva @ 2004-01-21 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Hello,
I've found this message in my logs while investigating some kernel Oops
(in other message). If you need more info, please ask.
Regards,
Rui Saraiva
Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/asm/semaphore.h:119
in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
Call Trace:
[<c0122ddb>] __might_sleep+0xab/0xd0
[<d1bd2df6>] uart_unregister_port+0x76/0xa9 [serial_core]
[<d1bd9559>] unregister_serial+0x19/0x20 [8250]
[<d1bcb2de>] acpi_serial_remove+0x2e/0x50 [8250_acpi]
[<c02523f0>] acpi_driver_detach+0xcc/0x184
[<c0252621>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x18/0x168
[<d1bcb312>] acpi_serial_exit+0x12/0x14 [8250_acpi]
[<c014510f>] sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x160
[<c0166307>] sys_munmap+0x57/0x80
[<c010a14f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6.2-rc1] sleep called from invalid context (8250/ACPI related?)
2004-01-21 11:40 [2.6.2-rc1] sleep called from invalid context (8250/ACPI related?) Rui Saraiva
@ 2004-01-21 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2004-01-21 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rui Saraiva; +Cc: linux-kernel, acpi-devel
Rui Saraiva <rmps@joel.ist.utl.pt> wrote:
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> Hello,
>
> I've found this message in my logs while investigating some kernel Oops
> (in other message). If you need more info, please ask.
>
> Regards,
> Rui Saraiva
>
>
> Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/asm/semaphore.h:119
> in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
> Call Trace:
> [<c0122ddb>] __might_sleep+0xab/0xd0
> [<d1bd2df6>] uart_unregister_port+0x76/0xa9 [serial_core]
> [<d1bd9559>] unregister_serial+0x19/0x20 [8250]
> [<d1bcb2de>] acpi_serial_remove+0x2e/0x50 [8250_acpi]
> [<c02523f0>] acpi_driver_detach+0xcc/0x184
> [<c0252621>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x18/0x168
> [<d1bcb312>] acpi_serial_exit+0x12/0x14 [8250_acpi]
> [<c014510f>] sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x160
> [<c0166307>] sys_munmap+0x57/0x80
> [<c010a14f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
acpi_driver_detach is calling the acpi_driver.remove() method under
the acpi_device_lock spinlock.
uart_unregister_port() happens to be using a semaphore for its locking.
I do think that it would be better if ACPI were to permit this. From a
quick peek it appears that acpi_device_lock can simply become a semaphore?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-21 21:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-21 11:40 [2.6.2-rc1] sleep called from invalid context (8250/ACPI related?) Rui Saraiva
2004-01-21 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome