* ATARAID (replacement) in 2.6.x
@ 2004-01-22 22:08 Nicklas Bondesson
2004-01-22 22:14 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicklas Bondesson @ 2004-01-22 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I wonder what the status is on implementing an ataraid (replacement) in the
2.6.x kernel tree. It can be done with device mapping, but it's still far
too tactless I think.
Thanks,
Nicke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: ATARAID (replacement) in 2.6.x
2004-01-22 22:08 ATARAID (replacement) in 2.6.x Nicklas Bondesson
@ 2004-01-22 22:14 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2004-01-22 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicklas Bondesson; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:08:25PM +0100, Nicklas Bondesson wrote:
> I wonder what the status is on implementing an ataraid (replacement) in the
> 2.6.x kernel tree. It can be done with device mapping, but it's still far
> too tactless I think.
Many disagree.
In fact it looks like MD will be merged with DM, so you might as well start
on usind DM for this too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-22 22:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-22 22:08 ATARAID (replacement) in 2.6.x Nicklas Bondesson
2004-01-22 22:14 ` Mike Fedyk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®