* RE: [ACPI] Re: APM good, ACPI bad (2.6.2-rc1 / p4 HT / Uniwill N258SA0)
@ 2004-02-03 8:16 Yu, Luming
2004-02-03 9:30 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-04 22:21 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yu, Luming @ 2004-02-03 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek, Huw Rogers
Cc: linux-kernel, ncunningham, linux-laptop, acpi-devel
>
> [Do *not* enable suspend on SMP for mainline, unless you are willing
> to audit that code...]
When do you want to have SMP support ? This is a laptop having HT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ACPI] Re: APM good, ACPI bad (2.6.2-rc1 / p4 HT / Uniwill N258SA0)
2004-02-03 8:16 [ACPI] Re: APM good, ACPI bad (2.6.2-rc1 / p4 HT / Uniwill N258SA0) Yu, Luming
@ 2004-02-03 9:30 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-04 22:21 ` Pavel Machek
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2004-02-03 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu, Luming
Cc: Huw Rogers, linux-kernel, ncunningham, linux-laptop, acpi-devel
Hi!
> > [Do *not* enable suspend on SMP for mainline, unless you are willing
> > to audit that code...]
>
> When do you want to have SMP support ? This is a laptop having HT.
Well, I want to have it two years ago... but its not there.
Original idea was to wait for CPU hotplug patches (hot-unplug all
other CPUs so we don't have to deal with locking), but cpu hotplug is
unlikely to make it into 2.6 at this point...
Plus I do not have easy access to SMP machine...
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [ACPI] Re: APM good, ACPI bad (2.6.2-rc1 / p4 HT / Uniwill N258SA0)
2004-02-03 8:16 [ACPI] Re: APM good, ACPI bad (2.6.2-rc1 / p4 HT / Uniwill N258SA0) Yu, Luming
2004-02-03 9:30 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2004-02-04 22:21 ` Pavel Machek
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2004-02-04 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yu, Luming
Cc: Huw Rogers, linux-kernel, ncunningham, linux-laptop, acpi-devel
Hi!
> > [Do *not* enable suspend on SMP for mainline, unless you are willing
> > to audit that code...]
>
> When do you want to have SMP support ? This is a laptop having HT.
Well, when _my_ laptop has HT, I guess :-)))))).
[Or when patrick/nigel gets to it, or when cpu hotplug is merged;
whichever comes sooner].
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [ACPI] Re: APM good, ACPI bad (2.6.2-rc1 / p4 HT / Uniwill N258SA0)
@ 2004-02-11 8:25 Yu, Luming
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yu, Luming @ 2004-02-11 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: Huw Rogers, linux-kernel, ncunningham, linux-laptop, acpi-devel
>
> Well, when _my_ laptop has HT, I guess :-)))))).
>
Great!
--Luming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-11 8:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-03 8:16 [ACPI] Re: APM good, ACPI bad (2.6.2-rc1 / p4 HT / Uniwill N258SA0) Yu, Luming
2004-02-03 9:30 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-04 22:21 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-11 8:25 Yu, Luming
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®